Author

admin

Browsing

Former National Institutes of Health employee Margaret Moore, accused by Republicans of helping others shield emails from the public, invoked her Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination at a deposition before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Friday.

Moore, a former FOIA public liaison for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), also declined to answer questions from Fox News in the hallway before the committee meeting. 

The committee on Monday issued a subpoena for Moore to appear.

‘Instead of using NIH’s FOIA office to provide the transparency and accountability that the American people deserve, it appears that ‘FOIA Lady’ Margaret Moore assisted efforts to evade federal recordkeeping laws,’ said Rep. Brad Wenstrup from Ohio, chairman of the subcommittee. 

He added, ‘Her alleged scheme to help NIH officials delete COVID-19 records and use their personal emails to avoid FOIA is appalling and deserves a thorough investigation.’

Moore’s legal team has defended her right to abstain from testifying, claiming that the former NIH employee has been willing to aid the investigation via alternative means.

‘Ms. Moore has cooperated with the Select Subcommittee through counsel to find an alternative to her sitting for an interview, including expediting her own FOIA request for her own documents, which she provided to the Select Subcommittee voluntarily,’ her legal team wrote.

Moore worked for NIAID for over three decades and at one point served as a special assistant to Dr. Anthony Fauci. 

She is accused of teaching ‘tricks’ to other members of NIAID to hide records and evade FOIA requests. 

‘I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear after I am foia’d but before the search starts,’ Fauci senior advisor Dr. David Morens wrote in an email sent from his personal Gmail account in Feb. 2021. ‘Plus I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to gmail.’

The materials sought by the COVID subcommittee would provide insight into the NIH’s relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, commonly believed to have been the origin of the coronavirus in 2019.

Other emails obtained from May 2021 show the NIH general counsel warning the FOIA office ‘not release anything having to do with EcoHealth Alliance/WIV,’ with ‘WIV’ referring to the Wuhan Institute.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A ‘painful’Israeli response weighs over the heads of the Iranian regime after their ballistic missile attacks on Tel Aviv on Tuesday. 

President Joe Biden has insisted that an angry Israel should not strike Iran’s nuclear sites – and should make sure its response is measured – proportional. 

‘Iran launched a war into Israel,’ said former deputy director of national intelligence Kash Patel. 

‘So to say that the Israelis who are defending themselves and our hostages shouldn’t attack sites in Iran that could kill them – especially when you’re the one who gave Iran $7 billion as a commander in chief and then allowed them to acquire nuclear materials – is wildly political.’ 

On Thursday, he revealed that he was ‘discussing’ recommending Israel target Iran’s energy facilities. 

‘That put the oil markets into a tailspin, even if we are talking to them about it. It’s not something you muse about publicly,’ said former Trump deputy national security advisor Victoria Coates. 

‘If you’ve made a decision, and you have something to announce, fine. You want to level with the American people as much as you can. These random comments are really damaging and confusing to the Iranians, because . . . they don’t have any guidelines or guardrails about what might be coming and so they might do something weird.’ 

Israel’s counterattack could come at any moment. ‘We will act. Iran will soon feel the consequences of their actions. The response will be painful,’ Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon told reporters.

Rather than its longtime goal of helping to negotiate a ceasefire, the Biden administration has now shifted its priority to containment – helping the region avoid all-out war between its two hegemonic superpowers. 

‘This is the 1930s all over again. G7 leaders – led by President Biden – are urging Israel to have a proportional and limited response against the Iranian regime,’ Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital. 

‘The idea of telling Israel what targets to strike ignores reality,’ he went on. ‘Would a proportional response be launching 200 ballistic missiles from Israel into Iran, mimicking what the Iranians did to Israel?’

Former President Donald Trump has not said how Israel should respond to the attacks – which he insists never would have happened under his watch. 

Striking Iran’s nuclear facilities risks provoking all-out war on yet another front for Israel in the eyes of the Biden administration. The Trump team is caught between an anti-war mindset and a penchant for supporting Israel without conditions. It’s unclear whether they still believe the two can exist in harmony.  

Proportionality is ‘clearly not what Israel is doing,’ according to Coates. 

‘It really seems to me that after the Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] left Washington in July, after that visit, some factor, or combination of factors, really changed his calculus,’ she said. 

‘He appears to have gotten home with the attitude of, ‘I want to get everything I can get done before the election.’ He’s not really listening to the White House at all, which is unfortunate.’ 

After Iranian plots to assassinate him and the hacking of his campaign, Trump did say that if he were president, he would tell Iran, ‘I’m going to blow you to smithereens’ if they harm any U.S. political figures. 

On Tuesday, Trump was asked whether he wished he had responded more forcefully after Iran fired dozens of missiles at U.S. forces stationed in Iraq in 2020, leaving many with traumatic brain injuries. 

‘So, first of all, ‘injured.’ What does ‘injured’ mean? ‘Injured’ means — you mean, because they had a headache? Because the bombs never hit the fort,’ Trump said.

‘So just so you understand, there was nobody ever tougher on Iraq,’ Trump continued, saying ‘Iraq’ instead of ‘Iran.’ ‘When you say not tough, they had no money. They had no money for Hamas. They had no money for Hezbollah. And when we hit them, they hit us. And they called us, and they said, ‘We’re going to shoot at your fort, but we’re not going to hit it.”

Defense officials have said more than 100 suffered traumatic brain injuries after the January 2020 attack.

That attack came after Trump ordered the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani due to an uncovered Iranian plot to kill American diplomats and service members. 

Trump vowed to hit 52 Iranian sites ‘very hard’ if Iran were to carry out the plot, representing the 52 Americans held hostage in Iran for 444 days after being seized at the U.S. embassy in Tehran in November 1979.

Still, in January, Iran lobbed attacks on two Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops, including the Ain al-Assad military base, and a second facility near Erbil airport.

In March, three U.S.-led coalition forces were killed when multiple rockets hit Taji military base. 

Trump, who withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions on Tehran, has insisted to reporters this week that ‘nobody [was] ever tougher on Iran’ than he was.

‘Look at the World today — Look at the missiles flying right now in the Middle East, look at what’s happening with Russia/Ukraine, look at Inflation destroying the World. NONE OF THIS HAPPENED WHILE I WAS PRESIDENT!’ he wrote on Truth Social. 

Alexander Vindman, the former Trump National Security Council Director for European Affairs for the United States, claimed that the former president was ‘fearful’ of escalation with Iran.  

‘Iran struck first and early, during Trump’s presidency, attacking US troops. Trump consistently recoiled in fear inviting further attacks,’ he wrote on X. 

‘Fact check: In 2020, Iran fired ballistic missiles at U.S. forces in retaliation for the Soleimani assassination. 110 U.S. service members sustained traumatic brain injuries. Many administration officials remain on an Iranian hit list today,’ former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said. 

But Patel argued the Biden administration’s lifting of sanctions on Iran — and the Obama administration’s 2015 nuclear deal — is what led to the attacks in the first place. 

‘The JCPOA, which was called the ‘Iran nuclear deal’ for a reason. It was never intended to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon. It literally gave them one on a timeline,’ he said. 

‘Now I believe they have one, because for four years they haven’t stopped them or slowed them down. They’ve only been successful in politicizing national security.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Taiwan’s top official in the U.S. is warning that China has ramped up its aggression toward the island, and that its people are ready to fight.

‘Yes, of course,’ Alexander Yui, the Taiwanese representative to the U.S., told Fox News’ Aishah Hasnie when asked whether the island’s residents were willing to meet the moment, if China were to invade. ‘We’ve seen Ukraine.’

Taiwan has been intensely watching the conflict in Eastern Europe as Kyiv’s forces have battled a Russian invasion for more than two years. 

Yui said he hoped to not need help from U.S. troops, which Ukraine also does not have, but suggested they would be eagerly accepted if offered.

‘If your house is under fire, and they respond to help you with a bucket of water, would you say no?’ Yui posed.

The diplomat said Chinese President Xi Jinping has escalated regional tensions since former President Donald Trump left office, but he stopped short of blaming the Biden administration for emboldening China.

‘XI Jinping has been emboldened because he wants to realize what he calls his China dream,’ Yui said. ‘It’s not about which administration is in the United States . . . but rather, what are the thoughts of Xi Jinping?’

Taiwan’s ministry of defense tracked eight Chinese military aircraft and two naval ships near the island earlier this week. The defense ministry said four of the eight planes crossed the median line dividing China and Taiwan’s territory in the Taiwan Strait – though Beijing, which claims ownership of Taiwan, does not recognize the geographic delineation. 

A week prior, on Sept. 25, Taiwan’s defense ministry said it had detected 43 Chinese military aircraft in a 24-hour period, with 34 having crossed the median line. The next day saw 41 Chinese military planes detected near Taiwan.

Xi is believed to be preparing his country for an invasion of Taiwan by 2027 – meaning the U.S. response would fall to whoever wins the presidency in November.

Asked if he had a message for Americans about Taiwan ahead of Election Day, Yui said it was a ‘peace-loving nation.’

‘We believe in democracy and freedom. We have to share the same values. And we want to be incorporated in the world, because we’ve been isolated for many decades due to the conflict that we have . . . with mainland China,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

After two decades of friendship, and as someone who had the honor to serve on Mrs. Trump’s White House team for a time, I am excited that the former first lady is finally telling her story in her forthcoming book, ‘Melania.’ For this reason, I can no longer remain silent as many self-proclaimed ‘experts’ continue to opine on her thoughts, her statements and her actions — especially when many of them have obvious malice in their hearts and money on their minds.

The hate-Trump media industrial complex is largely a money-making endeavor attracting many longing to remain relevant, become famous, advance personal agendas, or cash in while they can.  

Mrs. Trump’s response to all of this — she ignores all but the most egregious attacks — is not surprising to those who truly know her as a woman of tremendous strength, grace and resilience, a loving and devoted mother, wife, daughter and friend.

Their vitriol is only likely to reach a more fevered pitch in coming days, ahead of the Oct. 8 release of Mrs. Trump’s memoir, ‘Melania.’ Yet I remain hopeful that, with the book’s publication, the public will finally have a chance to learn her story, firsthand, and come to understand the remarkable woman I am so fortunate to call my friend. 

In my role as one of Mrs. Trump’s advisers in the White House, I was in many of the rooms and witnessed many of the moments that have since been drastically recast in books, tweets and interviews by former staffers— and I am aghast at the disparity between the truth I witnessed and the skewed narrative that is widely promoted.

Consider the ongoing rants of one of her former staffers, and self-proclaimed close friend, who has since worked indefatigably to promote herself while bashing Melania. After her contract with the White House was terminated, (full disclosure: my contract with the White House was also terminated at the same time) she wrote a one-sided book about her former boss. She admitted to secretly taping personal phone calls with Mrs. Trump, who was first lady at the time. An unprecedented breach of trust and civility if not ethics. 

Further, after leaving the White House, she began her campaign to criticize Mrs. Trump at every turn, apparently not only to sell her book but also to settle imagined personal scores. Like other former Trumpians, she apparently was positioning herself to be the go-to expert about a woman to whom she has not spoken now in more than seven years.

Examine her ongoing hateful tweets, such as opining about why Melania was not on the campaign trail with her husband last fall. When Mrs. Trump told reporters to ‘Stay tuned’ about her plans to campaign, this former staffer predictably chimed in with a supposedly all-knowing tweet: ‘Let me interpret this for you: DON’T HOLD YOUR BREATHE! [sic]’

How, exactly, would she know that — or anything else about the former first lady? She was clearly so far out of the loop that she was unaware that Mrs. Trump was caring for her dying mother at the time. So much for expertise. 

 

Then there is Mrs. Trump’s onetime White House press secretary, who also appears to be competing to become the Left’s Melania expert. This, after writing a self-aggrandizing book that attacked her former boss while auditioning for the never-Trump ‘conservative’ seat on ABC’s ‘The View.’  

This former ‘insider’ is the same person who, embarrassingly, could not correctly explain to reporters in 2018 why the first lady wore a now-famous Zara designer jacket with its bold logo — ‘I Really Don’t Care, Do U?’ — on a flight to visit migrant children detained at the Texas border.  This press secretary told reporters: ‘It’s just a jacket. There was no hidden message.’

How did she not know that the first lady was intentionally signaling to her critics with that jacket and not referring to the children? And if she had no understanding of Mrs. Trump then, while working for her, how can she possibly be considered an expert on her now when she has had no access to Mrs. Trump in years?

It took the former first lady herself to clear up the confusion and repair the damage. Melania told an ABC News interviewer that the jacket was ‘kind of a message, yes,’ but one directed at her critics: ‘I want to show them that I don’t care. You could criticize whatever you want to say, but it will not stop me to do what I feel is right.’

Sadly, we have rarely seen any positive reporting on Melania’s achievements because Mrs. Trump has seldom been recognized or credited for the important initiatives she undertook and supported during her four years as First Lady and in the years since. 

As first lady, she worked to focus attention on the opioid crisis and its toll on families when visiting Lily’s Place, a treatment center in Huntington, W.Va. She championed ‘Be Best,’ her campaign which aimed at building children’s wellness and emotional intelligence in education which included her work against cyber-bullying in schools. 

Since leaving the White House, she has created ‘Fostering the Future,’ to raise college scholarship funding for former foster children. Since its inception, ‘Fostering the Future’ has given out scholarships to many students. You have probably heard little about it. 

When consuming news, as with any other commodity, the old adage of ‘let the buyer beware’ has perhaps never been more relevant. It is essential for media consumers to approach information about politics with a critical eye, to seek out reliable sources, and to question the credibility of self-proclaimed experts. Otherwise, we may learn that it was our freedoms and our very way of life that were actually for sale all along.

As a wise man once said, ‘Consider the source.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Taiwan’s de facto U.S. ambassador is warning that China, Iran and Russia are forming an ‘alliance’ that the rest of the world should be ready for.

It comes days after Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the three autocratic countries were working together but not an ‘axis,’ as they have so often recently been called.

‘They’re working together, that’s for sure, whether that’s an axis or an alliance’ Alexander Yui, Taiwan’s representative to the U.S., told Fox News this week.

‘And as you know, it’s up to anyone to define it. But there were certainly there are symptoms, signs that they’re working together.’

During the interview, Yui also suggested that Taiwan’s government was in touch with both Vice President Harris and former President Trump’s circles to be prepared for whatever comes next in U.S. relations.

‘The whole world is watching, and I’m sure the diplomatic community here in Washington, D.C., is also watching closely and [trying] to reach out to both candidates or to the people around the candidates,’ Yui said.

Blinken penned an op-ed in Foreign Affairs Magazine on Oct. 1 that said world powers were in competition to set the stage for a ‘new age’ of international relations.

‘A small number of countries — principally Russia, with the partnership of Iran and North Korea, as well as China — are determined to alter the foundational principles of the international system. While their forms of governance, ideologies, interests, and capabilities differ, these revisionist powers all want to entrench autocratic rule at home and assert spheres of influence abroad,’ the Biden administration official wrote.

‘While these countries are not an axis, and the administration has been clear that it does not seek bloc confrontation, choices these revisionist powers are making mean we need to act decisively to prevent that outcome.’

Meanwhile, national security hawks on the right and left have warned that those four regimes were forging an unholy alliance not seen since WWII.

Both House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called them a new ‘axis of evil.’

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., House Democrats’ former majority leader, said after President Biden’s address on Israel and Ukraine in October 2023, ‘We face a new axis of evil today. The dictators, despots, and dealers of destruction leading Russia, North Korea, Iran, and Iranian proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah stand together in their assault on democracy.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Joe Biden held the floor for an impromptu Q&A session Friday afternoon during the White House press briefing, where he claimed Vice President Kamala Harris is ‘in constant contact.’ His comments may not come across as music to the Harris campaign’s ears.

In the president’s surprise appearance, he remarked on the port strike, the latest jobs numbers, and briefly on Hurricane Helene. No reporters asked about the administration’s response to the storm, but one asked Biden to assess whether Harris has been deeply involved in policy.

‘Well, she’s, I’m in constant contact with her. She’s aware we all, we’re singing from the same song sheet. We, she helped pass all the laws that are being employed,’ said Biden.

‘Now, she was a major player in everything we’ve done, including passage of legislation which we were told we could never pass. And so she’s been, and her, her staff is interlocked with mine in terms of all the things we’re doing,’ Biden continued.

The president strongly linked Vice President Harris to the Biden administration’s record over the past 3 ½ years, despite the Harris campaign’s attempts to distance her from everything from ‘Bidenomics’ to inflation to the border crisis, since Biden announced he was ending his reelection campaign, and Harris assumed the mantle of nominee. 

Harris recently changed the Biden fiscal year 2025 plan from a capital gains tax rate of 39.6% on a salary of $1M or more to her own 28%, for example. As illegal migration across the border surged to historic levels, Harris has also insisted she was never in charge of Biden’s border policy, despite Biden personally handing her the reins at the White House in March 2021.

Axios reported that Harris would begin creating some daylight between herself and Biden in August in order to defeat Trump, as inflation raged, wars in Ukraine and the Middle East heated up, the border crisis continued, crime lingered as a concern, and other factors, including Harris’ own weak approval rating, weighed her campaign down. Other outlets and pundits on the left soon followed suit. 

But Biden has reportedly bristled about his vice president distancing herself from him behind the scenes. He has also hinted that he believes he could have won the election had he not dropped out.

During an appearance on The View last week, Biden said, ‘I never fully believed the assertions that somehow there was this overwhelming reluctance to my running again. The fact of the matter is, my polling was always in range of beating [Trump].’ Biden even joked about jumping back into the race during Friday’s surprise appearance at the White House.

He also began his first White House briefing appearance of his presidency at the same Harris was taking the stage at a campaign event, raising questions over whether it was a communications issue between him and the campaign, or he was trying to upstage her. 

Biden sparked questions on the topic before, on the anniversary of September 11, by wearing a Trump hat momentarily. The White House referred it to as a ‘unity gesture’ – after Biden spent years casting Trump as a ‘threat to democracy.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The United Nations (U.N.) advisory body on artificial intelligence (AI) last week issued seven recommendations to address AI-related risks, but an expert told Fox News Digital the points do not cover critical areas of concern. 

‘They didn’t really say much about the unique role of AI in different parts of the world, and I think they needed to be a little more aware that different economic structures and different regulatory structures that already exist are going to cause different outcomes,’ Phil Siegel, co-founder of the Center for Advanced Preparedness and Threat Response Simulation (CAPTRS), said. 

‘I think that they could have done a better job of — instead of just trying to go to the lowest common denominator — being a little more specific around what does a state like the United States, what is unique there?’ Siegel said. ‘How does what we do in the United States impact others, and what should we be looking at specifically for us?

‘Same thing with Europe. They have much more strict privacy needs or rules in Europe,’ he noted. ‘What does that mean? I think it would have gained them a little bit of credibility to be a little more specific around the differences that our environments around the world cause for AI.’ 

The U.N. Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on AI published its suggested guidelines Sept. 19, which aimed to cover ‘global AI governance gaps’ among its 193 member states. 

The body suggested establishing an International Scientific Panel on AI, creating a policy dialogue on AI governance, creating a global AI capacity development network, establishing a global AI fund, fostering of an AI data framework and forming an AI office in the U.N. Secretariat. 

These measures, Siegel said, seem to be an effort by the U.N. to establish ‘a little bit more than a seat at the table, maybe a better seat at the table in some other areas.’ 

‘If you want to take it at face value, I think what they’re doing is saying some of these recommendations that different member states have come up with have been good, especially in the European Union, since they match a lot of those,’ Siegel noted. 

‘I think … it sets the bar in the right direction or the pointer in the right direction that people need to start paying attention to these things and letting it get off the rails, but I think some of it is just it’s not really doable.’ 

Multiple entities have pursued global-level coordination on AI policy as nations seek to maintain an advantage while preventing rivals from developing into pacing challenges. While trying to develop AI for every possible use, they also hold safety summits to try and ‘align’ policy, such as the upcoming U.S.-led summit in California in November. 

Siegel acknowledged the U.N. is likely to be one of the better options to help coordinate such efforts as an already-existing global forum — even as countries try to set up their own safety institutes to coordinate safety guidelines between nations. But he remained concerned about U.N. overreach. 

‘They probably should be coordinated through the U.N., but not with rules and kind of hard and fast things that the member states have to do, but a way of implementing best practices,’ Siegel suggested. 

‘I think there’s a little bit of a trust issue with the United Nations given they have tried to, as I said, gain a little bit more than a seat at the table in some other areas and gotten slapped back. On the other hand, you know, it already exists.

‘It is something that the vast majority of countries around the world are members, so it would seem to me to be the logical coordinating agency, but not necessarily for convening or measurements and benchmarks.’ 

Siegel said the U.S. and Europe have already made ‘some pretty good strides’ on creating long-term safety regulations, and Asian nations have ‘done a good job on their own and need to be brought into these discussions.’ 

‘I just don’t know if the U.N. is the right place to convene to make that happen, or is it better for them to wait for these things to happen and say, ‘We’re going to help track and be there to help’ rather than trying to make them happen,’ Siegel said.  

Reuters contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Saturday marks one month to go until Election Day on November 5.

As the presidential campaign enters the home stretch, it remains a margin-of-error race nationally and in the seven key battleground states likely to determine the winner of the election between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Trump.

Both national party chairs are confident of their chances.

‘We’re playing offense right now,’ Republican National Committee chair Michael Whatley said in a Fox News Digital interview earlier this week. ‘We feel very, very good about the map.’

His counterpart, Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison told reporters on Friday that ‘the enthusiasm is palatable in our party.’

But Harrison emphasized that ‘we know that this election will come down to the margins, and we’re not taking any vote for granted.’

Since replacing President Biden atop the Democrats’ 2024 ticket in mid-July, Harris has enjoyed a wave of momentum and enjoyed a surge in fundraising. In the all-important cash dash, Harris and the DNC appear to hold a large advantage over Trump and the RNC.

And that’s helped bolster what was already a very impressive ground game organizational advantage the Democrats held over the Republicans.

‘We started laying the foundation well before 2024 by investing in our ground game,’ Harrison highlighted. ‘We have been on the ground since the earliest days of this campaign getting our message out.’

The DNC chair touted that there are ‘more than 312 coordinated offices across the battleground states,’ with ‘over 2,000 coordinated staff…doing the hard work on the ground.’

But Whatley wasn’t phased.

‘The Democrats have a ton of money. The Democrats always have a ton of money,’ Whatley said, noting that Trump was outraised in both the 2016 and 2020 elections.

The RNC chair emphasized that ‘we have the resources we need to get our message out to our voters and to every voter. I feel very, very comfortable about the campaign plan.’

And while the Harris campaign and allied groups have outspent Trump and his aligned groups in the ad wars, Whatley pointed to the former president’s ability to capture free media.

‘Donald Trump is out there talking every single day to the voters in a way that only he can. He can generate news. He can go out there and generate social media hits. He can communicate directly with the American voters like no other politician of our generation, so it’s a huge advantage for us,’ he said.

Veteran Democratic pollster Chris Anderson, who conducted the Fox News Poll along with longtime Republican pollster Daron Shaw, said with four weeks to go, ‘my expectations of plausible outcomes range from a narrow Electoral College victory for Trump to a modestly more comfortable victory for Harris.’

But while Harris holds a slight two-point edge in an average of the national surveys, Shaw noted that ‘the issue profile of this election continues to favor Trump.’

Veteran political scientist and New England College president Wayne Lesperance said that ‘this presidential contest is shaping up to be one of the closest in history, with the results likely to be slow-coming.’

And longtime Republican consultant Matt Gorman, a veteran of numerous GOP presidential campaigns, highlighted that ‘we’re slated for the tightest race since 2000.’

‘There are no more debates. There’s going to be a vacuum of news,’ he said. ‘It’s integral the Trump campaign fill that vacuum with a message that puts Harris on the defensive.’

Trump, like Biden, is a well-known commodity. 

But Harris, even after being in the spotlight for nearly two months, is still less well-defined.

‘The more voters get to know Vice President Harris, the more they like her,’ Democratic strategist and communicator Chris Moyer argued. 

‘It’s imperative that she continues to get in front of swing state voters, and she could afford to do more in the final weeks,’ he offered. ‘She should barnstorm the key states, filling up her schedule with rallies and local interviews and off-the-record stops that produce shareable clips that bounce around social media. They’ve run a nearly perfect race to this point, but many voters still want to know more about who she is, what she believes, and what she will do as president.’

With one month to go, there’s always the possibility of an October surprise that could rock the White House race.

The dockworkers strike earlier this week – which closed major ports – could have wreaked havoc on the nation’s supply chain. It could have turned into an October surprise, but the strike was suspended after just two days.

Hurricane Helene, which tore a path of destruction through the southeast, also made an impact on the presidential contest – and there were memories of how Superstorm Sandy rocked the 2012 White House race between then-President Obama and GOP nominee Mitt Romney.

And the strife in the Middle East – between Israel, Iran, and Hezbollah, also threatens to upend the election.

It’s important to note that while Election Day is a month away, in over two-dozen states, early in-person voting, absentee balloting, and voting by mail, are already underway.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Virtually all of the world’s supply of a mineral that is critical to semiconductor production comes from one tiny town in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains that has been devastated by Hurricane Helene.

Spruce Pine, North Carolina has no running water or electricity, more than a week after Helene ripped through the town of 2,200. Roads and railways in and out of the area are severely damaged, according to local officials.

Mines in Spruce Pine produce the world’s purest form of quartz, which plays a central role in chip manufacturing.

Now, the town’s exceedingly valuable supply of high-purity quartz is at risk, threatening to cripple the $600 billion global semiconductor industry.

The natural disaster unfolding in Spruce Pine also highlights the continued instability of global supply chains, more than four years after Covid-19 drove home to Americans how dependent they had become on imported goods.

Two companies, Sibelco and The Quartz Corp., extract the high-purity quartz in Spruce Pine, refine it and export it to manufacturing facilities based primarily in China and other parts of Asia.

Much of the refined, high-purity quartz is then used to create a vessel called a crucible, which holds silicon as it is melted and transformed into the wafers on which semiconductors are made.

But mining, refining and shipping are all on hold, for now.

Both Sibelco and the Quartz Corp. were forced to halt operations on Sept. 26 due to the storm, which dumped more than two feet of rain on Spruce Pine, according to the National Weather Service.

The companies say there is no timeline right now as to when they expect to resume normal operations.

“The Spruce Pine community has been hit particularly hard,” Sibelco said in a statement on Sept. 30. “We have temporarily halted operations at the Spruce Pine facilities in response to these challenges.”

The Quartz Corp. said in an Oct. 1 statement that the company has “no visibility” as to when their operations will be able to resume.

For the semiconductor industry, the challenges that any long-term disruption to the Spruce Pine mines would present cannot be overstated, experts say.

“This is the only plant in the world right now that serves the semiconductor industry in its entirety,” said TECHCET CEO Lita Shon-Roy, who has studied the quartz supply chain for more than two decades. “If something were to happen to these mines, it can put the entire industry on its ear, period. There’s no other capability.”

What happens next, experts say, is a two-part question. First, operators need to determine whether there has been any damage to the quartz mines themselves, or to the equipment the companies use to extract or refine the mineral.

If mining operations can start up again, the secondary question is how either company will transport refined quartz to export markets, given the state of some of the infrastructure in western North Carolina.

TECHCET estimates it could be four to six weeks before the companies’ operations are running at full throttle again. But that forecast, Shon-Roy says, is dependent on roads opening back up, given that both companies rely primarily on trucking to move their minerals.

Early indications, however, are that transit infrastructure will require extensive rebuilding. 

“Roads are gone,” said Spencer Bost, the executive director of Downtown Spruce Pine, a nonprofit that partners with the city. In some areas, he said, “The roads just don’t exist anymore.”

When it comes to electricity, said Bost, “it’s not like power lines are down — telephone poles are gone.”

Yet there are still two glimmers of hope for the semiconductor industry.

The first is that there is likely some inventory of high-purity quartz stockpiled for the components it helps create. This could give the industry a cushion of two or three months, while Spruce Pine recovers from Helene, Shon-Roy said.

As the semiconductor industry emerges from its own downturn, demand has been fairly soft, said Shon-Roy. Additionally, ever since the pandemic most companies have been keeping larger inventories in stock.

“That will help cushion the delay in getting these plants restarted,” Shon-Roy said.

The other upside: The crucibles that quartz is used to create have a shelf life of about 300 to 400 hours — or roughly two weeks — before they need to be replaced, said Dustin Mulvaney, an environmental studies professor at San Jose State University who studies solar energy commodity chains.

As a result, there could be some lag before chip manufacturers are hurting for more. 

“But once they start having to replace the crucibles, that’s where you will run into the potential for disruption,” Mulvaney said.

The longer it takes for Spruce Pine’s mining industry to get back to work, the bigger the impact will be.

“A month’s delay is not bad,” said Shon-Roy. “Two months is getting difficult. Three months becomes a real problem.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Thousands of dockworkers on the East Coast and Gulf Coast will return to work after reaching a tentative agreement on wages, ending one of the biggest work stoppages in decades.

In a joint statement, the United States Maritime Alliance, or USMX, and the International Longshoreman’s Association said the two sides have an agreement to extend their current labor contract through Jan. 15 and continue to negotiate.

‘The International Longshoremen’s Association and the United States Maritime Alliance, Ltd. have reached a tentative agreement on wages,’ the union and the alliance said.

‘Effective immediately, all current job actions will cease and all work covered by the Master Contract will resume,’ the statement said.

The terms of the tentative wage agreement were not disclosed in the joint statement.

The International Longshoremen’s Association, known as the ILA, argued that big global cargo carriers have raked in huge profits since pandemic-era supply-chain snags drove up freight rates, and that workers haven’t sufficiently shared in those gains.

The United States Maritime Alliance, or USMX, represents major ocean freight and port operators. 

The union also sought limits on automation at ports. The joint statement only mentions wages.

The strike began at midnight Monday, going into Tuesday. The ILA strike that shut down ports is its first since 1977. That one lasted 44 days.

The work stoppage involved ports from Maine to Texas. The governors of New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Maryland were among those calling for a swift resolution to the labor dispute.

President Joe Biden on Thursday praised both sides for finding a way to get a tentative deal done so that ports can reopen and talks can continue.

‘Today’s tentative agreement on a record wage and an extension of the collective bargaining process represents critical progress towards a strong contract,’ Biden said.

The tentative wage agreement and resumption of the contract appears to end fears of higher prices for consumers and supply-chain issues had the stoppage dragged on. It also temporarily quiets a contentious labor issue with around a month left to go in the U.S. presidential campaign.

Biden had publicly urged USMX to make what he called a fair offer, and he said the alliance represents a group of foreign-owned carriers.

“Now is not the time for ocean carriers to refuse to negotiate a fair wage for these essential workers while raking in record profits,” Biden said in a statement Tuesday.

On Wednesday, with no deal in place, Biden increased the pressure by having White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients convene a meeting with CEOs of foreign carriers for Thursday, said sources familiar with the thinking of Biden and the White House.

National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard was able to get global shippers to increase their offer, although still not quite enough, the sources said.

Zients, Brainard, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su had a 5:30 a.m. call on Thursday with the shippers on Thursday, who by midday had agreed to move forward with the wage increases to reopen ports, the sources said.

The union and USMX will still need to come to terms on the question of automation, which has emerged as a more existential issue. Ports around the world have embraced technology that can make shipping faster, cheaper and safer, with U.S. ports now regularly lagging behind international ports in efficiency.

A Government Accountability Office report from this year found that U.S. ports had embraced some automation, but that labor opposition as well as cost were hindering the adoption of automation technology.

As for any lingering effects from the brief work stoppage, the number of ships waiting to dock has already started to decline, and no major disruptions are expected to be felt by consumers. Everstream Analytics, a supply chain risk management company, told NBC News that it will take about three weeks to clear the backlog.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS