Author

admin

Browsing

Wimbledon is to replace all of its line judges with Live Electronic Line Calling from 2025, the tournament’s organisers have said.

In a major break from tradition, the championships will follow the lead of the other Grand Slam tournaments, the Australian Open and US Open, as well as a number of other tour events.

Hawk-Eye technology has been used on certain courts at Wimbledon since 2007, helping officials and allowing players to challenge line calls.

From 2025, the system will be fully automated across the entire site, including during qualifying at Roehampton.

It means line judges will no longer be required for the first time in the tournament’s 147-year history.

The All England Club’s chief executive Sally Bolton said organisers went through “a significant period of consideration and consultation” before deciding to make the switch.

Testing was carried out at last year’s event, Ms Bolton said, and after seeing the results, the club has decided the technology is “sufficiently robust” to move to a fully automated system.

She said it means players will be competing under the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour.

The club takes its responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon “very seriously,” she added.

“Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at The Championships for many decades and we recognise their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.”

The French Open, which has relied solely on human officials, is now the outlier, although it may well follow suit, with all ATP Tour events to feature the technology from next year.

One major concern for Wimbledon had been the loss of a prestigious opportunity for officials and the effect this could have at the lower levels of the sport.

In another change to the schedule, next year’s singles finals will move from 2pm on the final Saturday and Sunday to 4pm, with the men’s and women’s doubles finals to be held first at 1pm.

This post appeared first on sky.com

Briton Sir Demis Hassabis has been awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry, jointly with two other scientists.

The trio of Sir Demis, as well as Americans Professor David Baker and Dr John Jumper, were honoured on Wednesday for their work on decoding the structure of proteins and creating new ones.

The research has helped advances across a range of areas including drug development.

Half of the prize was awarded to Prof Baker “for computational protein design”, while the other half was shared by Sir Demis and Dr Jumper “for protein structure prediction”, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

Sir Demis, 48, is the chief executive of Google DeepMind, the artificial intelligence (AI) research subsidiary of Google. He studied Computer Science as an undergraduate at Queens’ College, Cambridge, and went on to complete a PhD in cognitive neuroscience at University College London. He also created the videogame company Elixir Studios before co-founding DeepMind.

Prof Baker, 62, is a professor at the University of Washington, in Seattle, while Dr Jumper, 39, also works as a senior research scientist.

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper utilised AI to predict the structure of almost all known proteins, while Prof Baker learnt how to master life’s building blocks and create entirely new proteins, the award body said.

Sir Demis said: “It’s totally surreal to be honest, quite overwhelming.”

After thanking his colleagues, including Dr Jumper, he added: “David Baker, we’ve got to know in the last few years, and he’s done some absolutely seminal work in protein design.

“So it’s really, really exciting to receive the prize with both of them.”

It is the second Nobel Prize awarded this week related to artificial intelligence after John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton were honoured in the physics category.

Speaking about AI, Sir Demis said: “That’s always been my passion, but… it’s like any powerful general-purpose technology, it can be used for harm as well if put in the wrong hands and used for the wrong ends.”

The prize, widely regarded as among the most prestigious in the scientific world, is worth 11 million Swedish krona (£810,000).

This post appeared first on sky.com

“I don’t think the committee had our phone numbers,” said Sir Demis Hassabis.

He found out he’d won the Nobel Prize for chemistry – but the Swedish awards committee had a hard job letting him know.

They ended up phoning Sir Demis’s wife on Microsoft Teams, who was working and repeatedly ignored them.

“Eventually about the third or fourth call, she decided to answer it,” he said.

Google DeepMind boss Sir Demis and his colleague Dr John Jumper, as well as the US’ Dr David Baker, have just won the Nobel Prize for chemistry for their work in artificial intelligence and biology.

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper, both based in London, won for their groundbreaking work in predicting protein structures.

The AI model they developed, AlphaFold, can accurately predict the structure of millions of proteins, which are found in every living thing around us.

Their work could have a “truly huge” impact in developing medicines, vaccines and improving human health, according to the Nobel committee.

“An experiment that takes about a year for a PhD student to do, AlphaFold will predict the answer in a few minutes,” said Dr Jumper, talking to Sky News after a whirlwind day.

He’d expected to spend Wednesday just “writing a bit of code”, instead he was in back-to-back interviews with the world’s media and just like Sir Demis, Dr Jumper was taken aback when he found out he’d just won the Nobel Prize.

“I knew that the call [to say you’d won] went about an hour before the press conference,” he said. “It had got to 30 minutes before the press conference and I said, ‘Okay, not this year’.”

Dr Jumper is 39 years old, making him the youngest chemistry laureate in 70 years.

“After I told my wife, ‘Well, not this year’, I got a phone call from Sweden and it was… exceptional and unbelievable.

“The look on my wife’s face was my favourite part… Other than getting the Nobel Prize.”

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper announced AlphaFold2 in 2020 and have now been able to predict the structure of virtually all the 200 million proteins that researchers have identified, according to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences who award the prizes.

Because of their work, scientists now better understand things like antibiotic resistance and have even created images of enzymes that can decompose plastic.

The potential for their AI tool to change the world is not lost on Dr Jumper.

“As excited as I’ve been to receive the Nobel [Prize], I’ll be just as excited when the first Nobel is given for discoveries that used AlphaFold – when it’s the basis of other people’s Nobel worthy work,” he said.

However, there are some people concerned about the risks of technology like AlphaFold, the worry is that this kind of technology could be used to create things like bioweapons or to enhance viruses.

This year, a group of scientists, including Dr Baker, called for safeguards to be built into AI technology working with proteins.

“We just need to be cautiously optimistic about what we’re doing,” said Sir Demis.

“Being bold with applying it to the good use cases, but also trying to mitigate where we can the risks.”

The winning trio will now share a prize of 11 million Swedish kroner (around £810,000).

This post appeared first on sky.com

As we start the final month of the presidential campaign, the race appears to remain very close – much like every election of this century (except for Barack Obama’s first race in 2008). The latest Fox News national poll shows a two-point race in the national popular vote, with Vice President Kamala Harris slightly ahead of former President Trump 50-48 – and each of the seven key battleground states similarly showing the candidates within the margin of error from each other. 

If you want to drop into the weeds (and I guess that’s why they pay me), I think there remain five key numbers that will indicate which candidate has the momentum in the race – and tell you which campaign is closer to achieving its goal.  

I’d argue the key ‘weeds that count’ are: Trump’s ‘number,’ Trump’s support among Hispanic and African American voters, Harris’s support among Republicans who don’t describe themselves as ‘MAGA,’ and Harris-Walz support among voters in rural America. 

Trump’s number is the number I’ve looked at all year: His share of the popular vote. All year it has hovered around 48% – in all the most-respected public polls. Trump’s political persona is about as solidified as any American politician in my professional lifetime. There is little that he, his detractors, or his supporters can say or do that will shake voters’ impression of him – either positively or negatively. His vote share has basically remained what it is through almost a decade of his public life.  

So, all year I’ve focused on Trump’s share of the vote. It isn’t going to change dramatically, but small swings may indicate strength or emerging weaknesses. The arc of Harris’s campaign – she quickly consolidated support among the bulk of voters who’d told pollsters from 2023 until July that they were ‘undecided.’ They weren’t really undecided. They were voters who didn’t like Trump but were lukewarm about President Joe Biden. And now the bulk of them are in the Harris column.  

But what about the rest? Now when I look at the undecided number (and it’s remarkably small), I think there might be some hidden Trump vote there. For example, Trump is at ~47% in the better polls in Florida, and hovering around 50% in Texas in similarly respected polls. That’s below the 52% he got in Texas in both 2016 and 2020, and the 51% he got in Florida in 2020.  

He will almost certainly win both states, which suggests that some folks telling pollsters they’re ‘undecided’ will, in the end, choose Trump. On the other hand, it could be a sign of some weakness among Trump voters. 

The voter groups where Trump is showing surprising strength is his support among minorities, especially Hispanic and African American voters. Prior to dropping out of the race, Biden was doing remarkably poorly among those groups; Trump had gotten less than 10% of the African American vote in 2020, and 35% of Hispanic support.  

In the latest Fox News national poll (September), Trump is getting over 40% of the Hispanic vote and almost 30% of the Black vote. And it explains the closeness of the contests in the battleground states. Looking at those numbers is key. If Trump can continue to run strong among Hispanic voters, he’ll likely win Arizona and Nevada. If Harris can recapture some of the 2020 Biden strength among African Americans, she’ll be able to win Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia. 

Conversely, the Harris numbers to look at are her support among rural voters (the locus of Trump’s base) and at her support among Republicans who say they aren’t part of the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. 

One of the reasons Harris picked Minnesota Governor, and occasionally folks, Tim Walz, was to try to make inroads among rural voters. They didn’t want to win the rural vote – they just wanted to lose by less. It was the rural vote that likely earned Trump victories in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in 2016 and propelled him into the White House.  

Can he do it? So far, the jury is out. His suboptimal performance in the Vance-Walz debate likely did little to win over rural voters – but they’re still at it. He doesn’t appear to mind going into rural settings – where he is often greeted by Trump supporters booing him – so it is a number that is key to study. 

Finally, there remains the non-MAGA GOP voters. Somewhere between a quarter to a third of GOP voters describe themselves as ‘non-MAGA.’ This was the group who supported former Ambassador Nikki Haley in the primaries. At that time, according to the Fox News Voter Analysis of Iowa caucus goers and New Hampshire and South Carolina primary voters, almost half of them said they would not vote for Trump in November.  

There are only limited signs of Trump weakness among that group now that we’re in a general election campaign. Still, in the most recent Fox News Arizona state poll, roughly one-in-five non-MAGA GOP voters said they were supporting Harris. That translates to roughly 6% of GOP voters ‘defecting’ to Harris. That’s enough to keep the state close, but probably not enough to win. Still, it represents a clear danger signal for Trump.  

Of particular concern are other signs of non-MAGA defection. For example, the same poll tested the Senate race between Republican Kari Lake and Democrat Reuben Gallego. In that race (where Gallego has a clear lead), Fully 16% of Republicans said they’d vote for Gallego. 6% of GOP Arizona voters would vote for Harris and another 10% said that while they’d vote for Trump, they’d defect from the GOP in the Senate race.  

Either way, it shows the instability of GOP support – and a wavering among some parts of the GOP.  

If Trump is able to shore up that non-MAGA weakness, he’ll be well positioned in November – if Harris is able to pull some of them to her side, she’ll be well-positioned. So, looking at her numbers among non-MAGA GOP voters is key. 

Suprisingly enough, in that Vance-Walz debate, Vance did a good job of trying to appeal to that non-MAGA group. I say surprisingly, since when Trump picked Vance, some analysts complained that Trump had doubled down on the MAGA wing of the party – and left the non-MAGA (the Haley voter) by the wayside.  

But Vance’s smooth explication of his (and Trump’s) positions on school violence, the war in the Middle East, and immigration – probably went a long way to trying to ameliorate Trump’s non-MAGA weakness. 

Yes, it’s in the weeds, and, yes, the subgroups are small relative to the overall nation. In looking at these numbers, note that they are subject to a significant margin of error. They may show evidence of a shift or just statistical noise. But they are the key numbers to watch in the coming weeks: Trump’s overall number, Trump’s support among minorities, the Harris vote in rural America, and the Harris vote among non-MAGA GOP voters.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

For a year now, freeing the hostages taken by Hamas has been a top goal for Israel, but 101 still remain unaccounted for. Hope of a deal to get them homein the foreseeable future is waning quickly. 

Of the 240 people taken hostage from Israel by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, 117 have either been freed during temporary truces or rescued during Israel Defense Forces (IDF) missions. Dozens of the 101 who have not been freed are believed to be dead. 

Four Americans – Keith Siegel, 65, Sagui Dekel-Chen, 36, Omer Neutra, 22, and Edan Alexander, 21 – remain trapped among them.  

Many hostage families have lost faith in the U.S. and Israeli governments. ‘We don’t believe that Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s priority is to bring home the hostages,’ Hannaha Siegel, Keith Siegel’s niece, told CNN on Monday. 

‘The ability to negotiate with [Hamas Leader Yaya] Sinwar to try to get the hostages that remain alive out is extremely unlikely,’ said Mark Schwartz, a retired Army general and former U.S. security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

‘There’s no strategic benefit at all for Hamas. The hostages are useful human shields and getting several hundred Palestinians out of prisons, big deal,’ he said, referring to a potential prisoner exchange. ‘That’s not going to extend the life of Hamas leadership that resides inside Gaza.’ 

President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have for months implored Netanyahu to agree to a cease-fire deal that would see the hostages returned home. 

However, as war spread from Gaza to Lebanon to Tel Aviv – and with Israel considering an aggressive response to Iran’s most recent missile attack – U.S. calls for a cease-fire increasingly rattle around an empty echo chamber. 

‘The mood is poor right now,’ said Michael Makovsky, president of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America.

‘What’s in Sinwar’s interest to make a deal? Hamas’ military capability is pretty much destroyed. I don’t think he thinks he’s ever going to get out alive. I don’t think he necessarily wants to leave Gaza alive anyway.’

Sinwar, Hamas’ shadowy leader and the architect of the Oct. 7 attacks, is believed to be alive and still committed to the destruction of Israel. 

On the eve of the anniversary of the attacks, Netanyahu held his first meeting on the plight of the hostages in a month. According to The Times of Israel, his officials warned him intel on the hostages was quickly drying up. They reportedly told him they believed half of the hostages remained alive and were subject to increasingly squalid conditions. They also warned that Hamas militants were under orders to execute them if they felt the IDF was closing in on their position. 

Hamas executed six hostages in a tunnel in Rafah in August as the IDF drew near. 

‘You want to hold out hope for someone to be rescued, but for a hostage deal, it’s not looking good,’ said Makovsky. 

‘I think Netanyahu should have demonstrated more sympathy towards the hostages early on, and then it became kind of entrenched that half the Israeli electorate didn’t like him anyway, so he didn’t care.

‘In fairness to him, he was the prime minister that cut what turned out to be a terrible deal – which they released over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners – for one Israeli hostage in Gaza,’ added Makovsky. ‘One of those prisoners was Sinwar.’

In 2011, Israel agreed to an exchange where it released 1,027 Palestinian prisoners – including Sinwar – for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Sinwar was 22 years into four life sentences he received in Israel for orchestrating the killing of two Israeli soldiers and four Palestinians he believed to be collaborators in 1989. 

Gershon Baskin, who led negotiations on that deal, said he believes Hamas is ready to strike an agreement – and it is not the one U.S. officials have worked on for months. 

‘It would end the war in three weeks with an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. They would release and return all the hostages, military, civilian, alive and dead, and there would be an agreed-upon release of Palestinian prisoners. Hamas has agreed to me in writing that they would transfer the governance in Gaza to a civilian, technocratic, professional government, which they will not be part of.’ 

Critics of such ideas say they fall short of eliminating Hamas, which could rebuild itself and once again threaten Israel.

Baskin does not work on behalf of Israel or Hamas in any official capacity, but he said U.S. officials are aware of the offer and need to pressure Netanyahu and Hamas to work it out between themselves. 

In May, Biden unveiled a three-phase deal that would see Hamas return 18–32 hostages in exchange for 800 Palestinian prisoners and a six-week pause in fighting. 

‘It’s a bad deal, and I know that the American leadership – [CIA Director Bill] Burns and [White House Middle East coordinator Brett] McGurk and others have invested themselves deeply in these negotiations, but they need to simply recognize that it’s not going anywhere,’ Baskin said. ‘It’s a dead deal, and they need to pick up another deal that might actually work.’ 

Efforts to reach the White House and the Israeli government for comment for purposes of this story were unsuccessful at press time. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

New polling shows former President Trump has a 9-point lead over Vice President Kamala Harris when it comes to handling the economy, the single most important issue for voters going into the 2024 presidential election.

The new poll from Gallup found that 54% of Americans say Trump is more capable of handling the economy, compared to 45% for Harris. The economy ranked as the most important issue for Republicans and for all Americans, but it didn’t rate in the top five for Democrats.

Veteran Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf says Democrats are simply confident in Harris’ plan to handle the economy.

‘Independents are looking for a reason to vote for a candidate, but they just haven’t found it yet,’ Sheinkopf told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘Americans focus on the issue most important to them in every election. This time it’s their pockets. And they are still feeling pain no matter what candidates say. Time is running out for Harris to prove she can make it better.’

He went on to argue that the economy is no less politicized an issue as immigration or abortion, suggesting polarization has an outsized impact on voter’s opinions on the economy. 

For Republicans, the top issues after the economy are immigration, terrorism and national security, crime and taxes.

For Democrats, the top issue is democracy in the U.S., followed by the type of Supreme Court justices a candidate would pick, abortion, health care and education.

Trump also holds leads over Harris on immigration (54%-45%) and foreign affairs (52%-47%). Harris holds her own leads on the top issues for Democrats, however, including health care (54%-44%), abortion (56%-40%) and climate change (61%-35%).

Climate change ranks as the least important issue for Republicans, with just 5% saying it is a priority. The least important issues for Democrats are the federal budget deficit and trade with other nations, both tied at 16%.

Gallup conducted the poll from Sept. 16-28, surveying 941 registered voters via telephone interviews on cellphones and landlines. The poll advertises a margin of error of 4%.

A New York Times/Siena College survey released on Tuesday found that Harris has a slight lead over Trump in a national poll. The survey found that Harris stands at 49% support among likely voters nationwide, with the former president and GOP nominee at 46%.

According to the poll, Harris stands at 47% and Trump at 44% in a multi-candidate field. Green Party candidate Jill Stein and Libertarian Chase Oliver each grabbed 1%, with roughly 7% supporting another candidate or undecided.

Harris’ edge – which is within the survey’s sampling error – is up from the New York Times/Siena poll from last month, when the two major party nominees were deadlocked at 47%.

Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser and Ashley Papa contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In a five-year span, thousands of minors had gender reassignment surgeries, puberty blockers or hormone treatments at a number of children’s hospitals and medical facilities across the country, a medical watchdog is reporting via their new national database.

Do No Harm, a national advocacy group of medical professionals against ‘woke’ hospital agendas, shared the database, called ‘Does My Hospital Transition Kids?’, with Fox News Digital this week. In total, the group conservatively identified 5,747 minor patients who received sex-change surgery, and 13,994 received some sort of gender reassignment treatment between 2019 and 2023.

The data, de-identified to meet HIPAA compliance rules, shows nearly $120 million total in charges for treatments like sex change surgeries and hormone blockers. 

‘This is a very, very important issue, and it’s a very important issue to get right,’ Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, Do No Harm’s chairman, said in a press conference this week. 

‘And I think, as you’ll hear, we’ve really been meticulous in trying to make sure that the data are as clear as possible and are as accurate as possible. And because of that, you’re going to find that, if anything, we’re showing the lower limits of what’s going on in this whole arena,’ he said.

‘And to be certain that we’re not overstating it one iota, we’re probably, and almost certainly, understating the nature of the problem,’ he added.

Researchers analyzed insurance claims from private insurance companies, Medicaid and Medicare, excluding data from Kaiser, self-pay and charity care. They also profiled 68 children’s hospitals across the country and identified what they called the ‘Dirty Dozen’ institutions, which is a ‘list of the 12 worst-offending children’s hospitals promoting sex change treatments for minors,’ according to the new website.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) was identified as number one, followed by the Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Children’s Minnesota, Seattle Children’s, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Boston Children’s Hospital, Rady Children’s Hospital, Children’s National Medical Center, UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland, Children’s Hospital Colorado, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

According to the data, there are massive differences state by state, particularly in more liberal areas.

In California, charges exceeded $28 million from over 2,000 minor patients, while Massachusetts saw around $10 million in expenses from 671 minor patients. New York also had one of the highest rates of transgender treatments for young people, with 1,154 minor patients undergoing sex changes between 2019 and 2023.

California, one of the first states to declare itself a ‘sanctuary state’ for transgender procedures, also had the most irreversible surgeries, with 1,359 minors undergoing surgical procedures, followed by Oregon with 357, Washington with 330, Pennsylvania with 316 and Massachusetts with 300.

‘Adults can do as they wish, but we feel very strongly that the science behind using these treatments in children is extraordinarily flawed and suggests that children are being harmed in that sense. One of the important issues is to develop some quantitative notion of what’s really happening in this arena,’ Goldfarb said. ‘And there are lots of myths that are out there, lots of ideas that this is a rare event, lots of ideas that this is localized to just a few places.’

Activist and detransitioner Chloe Cole, who underwent a double mastectomy at 15 years old and put on puberty blockers and testosterone at age 13, said the new database ‘proves the lies from the medical establishment and radical politicians who argue that cases like mine are rare.’

‘The stats in this database represent thousands of kids who are being treated like Guinea pigs for unproven, and sometimes dangerous, medical experiments. I hope politicians and parents alike use this database to see where these treatments are happening and protect their children from being rushed into irreversible, life-altering treatments,’ Cole said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

Some of the listed hospitals’ board members have openly advocated for transgender youth care over the years. CHOP also has a specific Gender and Sexuality Development Program department, which ‘supports children and teens up to age 21 who are gender nonconforming, gender expansive and transgender,’ according to its website.

Madeline Bell, president and chief operating officer of CHOP, affirmed at the time of the department’s launch in 2014 the hospital’s commitment to providing ‘culturally competent and affirming healthcare’ to LGBT patients and their families.

‘This is a tremendous honor that reflects CHOP’s dedication to provide culturally competent and affirming healthcare to our LGBT patients and families,’ Bell stated.

In June 2019, president of the American Board of Pediatrics, Dr. David Nichols, emphasized the increasing need for ‘specialized healthcare’ for the growing transgender youth population during the release of the 30th edition of the ‘KIDS COUNT Data Book,’ published by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. This annual report provides a comprehensive review of child well-being in the U.S.

‘We have a growing transgender youth population that is receiving healthcare, and the pediatric community has had to adapt to that with clinics and programs to care for these kids. This was not something that existed 30 years ago when ‘KIDS COUNT’ first started,’ Nichols said. 

Pressure from conservative politicians and activists has been mounting in recent years against medical providers who conduct transgender surgical procedures on children. Last month, a group of attorneys general across the country demanded that the American Academy of Pediatrics rescind its support for transgender procedures – such as puberty blockers and surgeries – on children. 

The database is just another tool to ‘expose the dangers of experimental pediatric gender medicine and bring the practice to an end,’ Do No Harm stated in a news release. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney won’t endorse Vice President Kamala Harris for president despite his outspoken criticisms of former President Trump. 

‘I’ve made it very clear that I don’t want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States,’ Romney said Tuesday at the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah, The New York Times reported.  

‘I want to continue to have a voice in the Republican Party following this election. I think there’s a good chance that the Republican Party is going to need to be rebuilt or reoriented,’ he later added during the political forum. 

Romney announced last year that he would not seek re-election as a senator representing the Beehive State, and will leave office in January. The Republican has long criticized Trump, and indicated in June that he was unlikely to support the 45th president’s re-election. 

‘With President Trump, it’s a matter of personal character,’ Romney told CNN at the time. ‘I draw a line and say when someone has been actually found to have been sexually assaulted, that’s something I just won’t cross over in the person I wouldn’t want to have as president of the United States.’ Romney’s comments referred to a federal jury’s decision in New York City last year, which ruled Trump was not liable for the rape of E. Jean Carroll, though the former president was liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

Romney has also slammed Trump for Jan. 6, 2021, when supporters of the then-president breached the U.S. Capitol, arguing Trump incited an insurrection due to his ‘injured pride’ over the 2020 election. Romney subsequently was one of seven Republican members of the Senate who voted to impeach Trump over Jan. 6. 

Romney was also the only Republican who voted to impeach Trump in 2020 over abuse of power and obstruction of Congress charges. Trump was acquitted in both impeachment cases, and is the only president in history who was impeached twice and acquitted twice. 

Trump has also hit back at Romney, saying in 2020 that the Utah senator ‘can’t stand the fact that he ran one of the worst campaigns in the history of the presidency,’ referring to his 2012 bid for the White House, and calling him a ‘disgrace’ that same year for voting to impeach. 

While Romney has previously broken with the GOP on other key issues, he indicated Tuesday that he will not offer his endorsement to Harris despite other Republicans recently throwing their support behind the vice president. Former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney officially endorsed Harris last week and joined her on the campaign trail in Wisconsin, while former Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger and former Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake also endorsed Harris. 

Fox News Digital reached out to Romney’s office for additional comment on the matter, but did not immediately receive a reply. 

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

GRAPEVINE, Texas — When shoppers walk into Sam’s Club’s newest store, they’ll soon see a shiny blue Mercedes-Benz SUV, a sectional sofa and zero checkout lanes.

Welcome to the Walmart-owned membership club’s first all-digital store — and a preview of what could be its future.

Inside the club, which will open in mid-October, customers will have to use a smartphone app called Scan & Go to ring up their purchases as they walk through the aisles. In the area typically reserved for cash registers, the company will display online-only items as wide-ranging as a 12-foot Christmas tree and a five-carat lab-grown diamond. Members can scan QR codes and go straight to the items in the app.

Store workers will have about four times more space for preparing customers’ e-commerce orders for curbside pickup and home delivery, according to Sam’s Club executives.

“It’s kind of the physical manifestation of a journey we’re trying to go on as a company,” Sam’s Club CEO Chris Nicholas said, as he showed off the club before its grand opening.

Since Walmart founder Sam Walton opened the first Sam’s Club in 1983, the membership-based club has become the more tech-savvy arm of its retail-behemoth parent. The club has spun out several key innovations that its parent company now uses, too, such as Scan & Go. It’s also used digital offerings to try to outmatch its largest rival, Costco.

Sam’s Club is doubling down on that strategy with the Dallas-area store, which is reopening nearly two years after it was damaged by a tornado.

Nicholas said upon its reopening, the location will become a testing ground for Sam’s Club’s newest features and emerging technology.

“The idea is that over time, we will be 100% digital engagement as a business, and you’ve got to prove that things work before you scale them,” he said.

He added that he hopes “it feels like what it’s like to shop in the future.”

Costco has long been “the king of the warehouse club channel,” said Peter Keith, senior research analyst at Piper Sandler. But Sam’s Club has added features to “upgrade the shopping experiences,” he said, such as introducing a permanent station in some of the clubs where a chef makes sushi rolls in front of customers.

And notably, Sam’s Club has differentiated iself by embracing e-commerce offerings and appealing to customers who are seeking easier and faster ways to shop, such as Scan & Go.

“It really eliminates the most painful part of these membership clubs, which is the long lines to check out,” he said.

Sam’s Club and Costco have roughly the same number of U.S. clubs, but Costco pulls in about twice as much annual revenue. Net sales for Sam’s Club totaled $86.2 billion in its most recent fiscal year, compared with $176.63 billion for Costco’s U.S. clubs.

Sam’s Club has made several other key moves to catch up to Costco: It consolidated its private labels from more than 20 different brands into a single one: Member’s Mark. It cut back on the number of unique items it sells, so it focuses on the proven and popular ones. And it recently announced it would raise average hourly wages for nearly 100,000 of its workers ahead of the holiday season.

Sam’s Club also opened The Clubhouse in August, an approximately 37,000-square-foot office building across from the retailer’s headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. It includes workshop rooms and tools such as white boards, arts and crafts supplies, and cardboard models that will help the retailer to come up with new ideas, test products and collaborate on projects with cross-department teams.

And it’s in the middle of an aggressive expansion, with plans to open about 30 new clubs over a five-year period.

Sam’s Club’s comparable sales in the U.S., a metric that includes sales from stores and clubs open for the previous 12 months, grew 5.2% in the most recent quarter, which ended July 31, compared with the year-ago period. That included 22% year-over-year e-commerce growth.

Nicholas said the new clubs, including the one that’s opening in Grapevine, will be designed to better handle higher volume, too.

For example, the club’s cafe will include a pizza robot that will be able to make as many as 100 pizzas in an hour. It will also test a new system that delivers food orders to an assigned cubby after customers order through Scan & Go.

Like its parent company, Walmart, Sam’s Club has been attracting customers across a wider range of incomes and ages as it focuses on offering convenient ways to shop. About half of the new members that joined Sam’s Club during the most recent quarter were millennials or Gen Zaccording to the company.

The company said 1 in 3 members currently use Scan & Go when shopping in clubs. It has recently rolled out new exit technology that automatically checks customers’ shopping carts and allows them to exit the club without an employee looking at a receipt or auditing their cart. Shoppers walk under an archway that’s powered by computer vision and artificial intelligence. That system functions similarly to Amazon’s Just Walk Out technology that’s begun to take hold at events stadiums in addition to some of the e-commerce giant’s physical storefronts.

But Nicholas, the Sam’s Club CEO, acknowledged some shoppers may be reluctant to embrace new technology or a new routine.

Tiffany Zuniga, a mom and a Lyft driver who lives in the Dallas area, said she’s eager to return to Sam’s Club, but is a little wary of the new technology. Zuniga said she used to turn to the club for easy family dinners or supplies for church events, but switched to Costco when Sam’s Club was closed because of tornado damage.

She’s never used Scan & Go and said she hopes the new technology doesn’t come at the expense of customer service.

“Sometimes it can get a little dicey if you scan the wrong thing or need help,” she said. “Hopefully, they will have enough staff on hand.”

As construction crews finished up work on Sam’s Club in Grapevine, the retailer put up signs at the nearby Sam’s Club gas station and car wash to alert customers to the return of the club and encourage them to download the Scan & Go app.

And when customers walk into the newly reopened club, employees will be ready to help them download the app or to tag along on a shopping trip if they need help learning how to use it, the company said.

Nicholas said there will be no change to the number of store workers in Grapevine, but some will have new roles.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Amazon plans to bring same-day prescription delivery to 20 more cities next year, the company said Wednesday, marking the latest phase of its push into health care.

As part of the expansion, which will make speedy medicine delivery available in nearly half of the U.S., Amazon said, it is embedding pharmacies in same-day delivery facilities often clustered around major metro areas. The company announced its plans during a press event at one of its warehouses near Nashville, Tennessee.

Amazon in March introduced same-day pharmacy delivery in New York and Los Angeles, after launching the service in Indianapolis, Miami, Phoenix, Seattle, and Austin, Texas. Some of the cities that will be added in 2025 include Boston, Dallas, Minneapolis, Philadelphia and San Diego.

The company has worked to accelerate medication deliveries. It’s been testing prescription delivery by drone in one Texas city. In most cases, the company said, when shoppers order same-day delivery of their medication by 4 p.m. they can receive it at home by 10 p.m.

The prescriptions are offered through Amazon Pharmacy, a section of its website and app that allows shoppers to order medication, with free delivery for Prime members. Launched in 2020, Amazon Pharmacy was born out of the company’s 2018 acquisition of online pharmacy PillPack. The company in January said it had doubled the number of customers it serves in the past year, though it didn’t provide a specific number.

It faces competition from traditional pharmacies such as CVS and Walgreens, as well as other large retailers that offer pharmacy services, such as Walmart. Amazon said Wednesday it’s capitalizing on the care gaps created by the growing number of “pharmacy deserts” in the U.S., which can limit a patient’s access to medications and pharmacist care. Chain stores such as Walgreens and CVS have shuttered hundreds of locations recently as they struggle to maintain profitability.

Amazon’s online pharmacy is a part of the company’s multiyear effort to make inroads in the health-care industry. The company acquired primary care provider One Medical for roughly $3.9 billion in July 2022. It launched then shuttered its telehealth service, Amazon Care, along with a line of health and wellness devices.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS