Author

admin

Browsing

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has apologized after using an ableist slur to taunt political opponents in parliament.

Albanese was speaking during question time on Tuesday when opposition lawmakers repeatedly interrupted him.

“Have you got Tourette’s or something? You know, you just sit there, babble, babble, babble,” he said, before immediately adding: “I withdraw and apologize.”

Albanese later returned to the chamber to make a more formal apology.

“I made comments that were unkind and hurtful. I knew it was wrong as soon as I made the comment,” he said.

“I apologized and I withdrew as soon as I said it, but it shouldn’t have happened and I also want to apologize to all Australians who suffer from this disability.”

Albanese’s apology came after strong criticism from figures including shadow minister for health and aged care Anne Ruston.

Tourette’s syndrome is a neurological disorder that involves tics that present themselves in various ways, described by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke as “repetitive, stereotyped, involuntary movements and vocalizations.”

“Mocking a disability is no laughing matter,” Ruston wrote in post on X, adding that the comment was “absolutely despicable behaviour” from Albanese.

“Australians living with Tourette’s deserve the PM’s respect, not his ridicule,” she added.

“I’m incredibly disappointed and just gobsmacked somebody that has the national stage would use that platform and Tourette syndrome to make an insult,” she said.

Maysey, who has three children with Tourette’s, said the disability can be socially isolating.

“This shows we have a very long way to go until Tourette syndrome is taken seriously as a condition,” she added.

Singers Lewis Capaldi and Billie Eilish have both spoken about their experiences of living with Tourette’s.

“The worst thing about it is when I’m excited I get it, when I’m stressed I get it, when I’m happy I get it. It happens all the time,” Capaldi said in February 2023.

A few months later, Capaldi announced that he was taking a break from touring due to the impact of Tourette’s

In 2022, Eilish told David Letterman that the condition can be “exhausting.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

The Italian government is facing a new set of challenges as it prepares to open two migrant processing centers in Albania in October where men rescued at sea en route to Italy will be processed for asylum.

It’s a move which the hard-right administration says will combat human trafficking and allow in only those who have a genuine right to enter the European Union, but which has drawn scorn from human rights groups.

On Friday, the European Court of Justice ruled that the plan to offshore migrants from countries Italy deems “safe” but which the European Union does not, is not legal.

However, the court’s decision is non-binding and Italy and Albania are not prohibited by the ruling from going forward with the plans. The centers – one in the Albanian port city of Shengjin and the other further inland in Gjader – were supposed to open on May 1 after the two nations signed a bilateral agreement last November, but “unforeseen circumstances” including building delays and bureaucracy have repeatedly pushed back the opening.

Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi said last month: “We will start in October. There’s definitely been a few months of delay, there were some normal checks, in which we discovered, for example, that the ground needed to be reinforced. That’s all, very normal variations during construction.”

In August, the Italian government opened a trial detention center near Agrigento, Sicily, intended to mirror those in Albania by housing men from “safe” countries for fast repatriation. A court in Catania ruled the measure illegal under Italian law, but that ruling was overturned and two Tunisian men were deported without having their asylum requests processed on September 11, Piantedosi said in a post on X.

Seaborne migration on the central Mediterranean route, to Italy and Malta, is down by more than 60% on this time last year, according to Italy’s Interior Ministry and Europe’s Frontex agency. The decrease in the central Mediterranean has meant an increase in migrants trying to make it to Greece and Spain, according to Frontex statistics, and is largely due to clampdowns on NGO rescue ships and Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s frequent trips to both Libya and Tunisia to apply pressure to keep migrants from leaving.

The drop in numbers notwithstanding, the Italian government is continuing to pursue an anti-immigration platform, which is widely supported by voters with Meloni enjoying a 44% approval rating, according to an Ipsos poll in September 2024.

Meloni’s so-called “Rome Process,” which she says aims to deter illegal migration and to tackle its root causes, has been of great interest to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who visited the Italian capital in September and pledged €4.75 million to the initiative, her office said.

“We talked about the Italy-Albania agreement, which is a solution that the British government is showing a lot of interest in, and clearly we have offered them all the elements to better understand this mechanism,” Meloni said during a press conference after the bilateral visit.

Meloni said Starmer had expressed interest in using the Albanian centers for migrants crossing the English Channel, but Albanian President Edi Rama told the European Parliament on September 19 that the centers were only open to Italy-bound migrants. “This is an exclusive agreement with Italy because we love everyone, but with Italy we have unconditional love,” Rama said.

Albania lies just across the Adriatic Sea from Italy but is not an EU member state.

In 2023, more than 157,000 people arrived illegally in Italy by boat from Libya and Tunisia, with hundreds known to have died trying, making the issue of sea migration one that all sides of the political spectrum agree must be better managed.

The asylum process is lengthy, meaning many would-be asylum seekers give up and slip into the periphery of Italian society or travel to countries in the north of Europe.

Amnesty International has called the Italy-Albania plan “shameful,” saying intercepted migrants will face a lengthier journey by sea to Albania, a potentially prolonged detention once there, and a likely curtailment of their right to seek asylum.

‘Don’t court the local women’

The centers will house up to 3,800 adult men at a time, who will be guided through the application process for requesting asylum in Italy, the Italian authorities say. If they do not qualify for asylum, they will be deported to “safe” countries, according to the agreement between Italy and Albania.

“We have been told not to be ‘too Italian,’” said the officer, who asked not to give his name since he is not authorized to speak for the unit. “We were given a handbook that outlines how to behave: no nudity, don’t court the local women, and drink coffee sitting down, not standing up at the counter.”

The handbook also describes Albanians as “modest people” and guides the incoming officers on how not to act “superior” to them. Flirting is a no-no. “Avoid courting Albanian women in various contexts and in an extemporaneous manner. It is a conservative society. The man who sees his woman being courted by another man can react badly,” the handbook also warns.

In all, Italy will provide 500 personnel, including police and military officers, health workers, and staff from the Justice Ministry, at an estimated cost of €252 million (about $278 million), according to Meloni. A local restaurateur in Shengjin has even opened the “Trattoria Meloni” to pay homage to the Italian prime minister for the investment in Albania, which has and will continue to benefit the local areas financially.

Additionally, Italy will pay €670 million (about $738 million) over the initial five-year contract for the centers’ operation and also pay for a second perimeter of security to be manned by Albanian guards to make sure none of the asylum seekers can escape. The cost comes to around 7.5% of what Italy currently spends on its migrant reception centers, Meloni said in June, speaking alongside Rama.

‘Clear risk’

The Shengjin port center will at first have just 880 places and is where all arrivals will be processed. Those who qualify to have their asylum claim heard will then move to the center in Gjader, which will open with 144 beds and then be expanded to hold 3,000 people while they await a response to their application from Italy. The complex also has a maximum-security 20-bed prison and emergency medical services.

The agreement states that only migrants from 22 nations considered by Rome to be “safe countries” will be sent to Albania, including men from Bangladesh, currently the fastest growing demographic arriving in Italy by sea, according to Italy’s Interior Ministry.

Other listed “safe countries” include Egypt, Tunisia and the Ivory Coast, citizens of which make up a large portion of arrivals. The European Court of Justice does not consider Tunisia and Egypt completely safe, which is at the crux of last week’s ruling.

Those who are from countries not deemed safe by Rome, such as Afghanistan and Syria, will initially be taken to Albania but later transferred to Italy for processing once their country of origin is confirmed.

The policy of “offshoring” asylum seekers has been heavily criticized by human rights groups.

“There is a clear risk that the operation intends to hide a strategy to create inaccessible reception centers, far from prying eyes and journalistic investigations, and from the nightmare of having to find a place for them in Italy, where no administrator, of any political stripe, can find them,” said Schiavone.

Piantedosi insists the opening of the Albanian centers is meant to act as a deterrent for migrants seeking to be smuggled into Italy. Meloni, who campaigned on a promise to “stop the boats,” has credited her government’s policies on investments in North African countries and punishing NGO migrant rescue vessels for this year’s decrease in arrival numbers.

The United Nations’ International Organization for Migration says that an increase in deaths of migrants at sea and a rise in migrant boats known to have departed from Libya and Tunisia going missing, presumed sunk, have also contributed to a drop in arrivals.

Questions over how to handle the many thousands of migrants who seek to enter Europe each year, often fleeing war, persecution and poverty and traveling in boats that are barely seaworthy, may be focused on border nations like Italy, Greece and Spain, but the ramifications extend beyond these frontline countries.

A group of 15 European countries, led by Denmark and including Italy, has petitioned the European Union to consider finding “new solutions,” like the Italy-Albania agreement, to help deal with irregular migration and “create a fairer, more humane, sustainable and efficient asylum system worldwide.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Fay Manners and Michelle Dvorak were perched high on the snowy face of a Himalayan mountain when disaster struck their quest to become the first to summit its peak.

At more than 6,000 meters (about 20,000 feet) above sea level, a falling rock sliced through the rope carrying Manners’ bag, leaving the climbers stranded in the inhospitable wilderness without vital supplies including their tent, stove, food, crampons and ice axes.

“All I can really remember is just seeing the bag go down the mountain and being really shocked, thinking, ‘How has this happened? Like, what’s going on?’”

But for both climbers, their immediate reaction wasn’t fear for their safety or survival – it was devastation that their mission, which required painstaking preparation, training, and altitude acclimatization, was being cut short when they were so close to their goal.

Manners, a Briton living in France, and Dvorak, an American, had been “absolutely desperate” to reach the summit of the unclimbed peak in India’s northern Uttarakhand state.

Their attempt to climb the nearly 7,000-meter Chaukhamba III began on September 27, as they clambered across ice and rock and slept on narrow ledges. The approach to the mountain alone was incredibly tough, Manners said – they had chosen a maze-like route that navigated endless deep crevasses and precarious snow bridges that risked collapsing in warmer weather. It took three attempts before they could even reach the base of the mountain, she said.

“We were near the end of all the difficulties … (we) maybe had one more day to get to the summit, and then we would have been the first to reach this summit,” Manners said. Instead, “our dreams were just falling down the mountain.”

Without their gear, climbing back down and across the crevasses was near-impossible, so they contacted emergency services for help. But the severity of their situation soon became clear when helicopters failed to spot them on the vast mountain face the next morning – and again the following day.

“We searched all day at the coordinates provided to us by the tour company but did not find anything,” he said.

All the while, the climbers had no food besides two energy bars that they “nibbled on,” and no water, since their stove to melt snow had been lost, Manners said.

Even their dehydrated food was no use without the stove. At one point, desperate and dehydrated, they abseiled to a spot with dripping ice and collected a tiny amount of water during the few hours when the sun was out.

And the conditions steadily deteriorated as they faced a snowstorm, hail and even an avalanche. They huddled together in their wet sleeping bag, hair frozen solid, with nighttime temperatures reaching –15 degrees Celsius (5 degrees Fahrenheit).

“I was close to hypothermia, I think, and I was shaking so violently through the night that Michelle had to hold my legs to just try and keep me warm,” Manners said. “That sleeping bag saved our lives.”

That’s when they knew they had to act, even if they were weak and disoriented, she said. The next morning, they began abseiling down the mountain through thick fog, knowing the journey back to base camp could be “incredibly dangerous” with high chances of serious injury or falling down a crevasse.

But as they reached the bottom, they glimpsed a group of French mountaineers – a rival team that had also been hoping to reach the summit first. Negi, the information officer, said Indian authorities had reached out to the French team for assistance after being unable to locate Manners and Dvorak.

When Manners realized the French team had been sent to rescue them, “all my emotions came out at once, and I had some tears in my eyes,” she said.

With their help, she and Dvorak trekked to the French base camp, munching on cheese their rescuers had brought from France, she said. The Indian Air Force then airlifted them to a nearby hospital on Sunday, three long days after they were stranded.

Both climbers are uninjured and eager to fly home. And their brush with death hasn’t deterred them from following their dreams, said Manners, who encourages women and girls to pursue the sport. She wants to try the summit again next year – perhaps with the French team who rescued them.

When people look at their experience, she hopes they see two strong women who “got really close to the top,” she said. And when things went awry, they were “still able to survive and manage themselves through that really adverse and terrible situation.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

A pilot who died when he crashed a helicopter into a hotel in Australia had “significant blood alcohol content” during the unauthorized flight, according to an official report into the incident.

Hundreds of guests and staff were evacuated from the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel in Cairns in Far North Queensland on August 12, when the aircraft hit the top floor and burst into flames.

At the time, charter company Nautilus Aviation said the pilot was a member of its ground crew who had attended a party the night before the crash to celebrate a promotion.

He wasn’t authorized to fly the aircraft but had access to the helicopter, the keys to which were routinely left inside the aircraft when it was parked inside the hangar.

The report released by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) Thursday found that the pilot “was affected by a significant amount of alcohol” and flew “well below the 1,000 ft (304 meters) allowed for flight over a built-up area.”

Investigators did not reach a conclusion as to why the pilot took the helicopter, or if he did so with the intention of crashing it into a hotel.

“For reasons unknown, pilot actions resulted in a collision with a building while conducting an unauthorised and unnecessary flight, while affected by alcohol, late at night and at low heights over a built-up area, and without night flying endorsements,” the report concluded.

The pilot had been out with friends at various venues around Cairns and was seen consuming alcohol, according to witnesses and security camera footage, the report said.

Cameras also caught the moment he positioned one of Nautilus Aviation’s Robinson R44 Raven II helicopters onto a helipad at Cairns Airport at around 1:30 a.m. local time.

For several minutes, the pilot turned off the helicopter’s cockpit and strobe lights before taking off and heading in the direction of Cairns city center, the report said.

Australian Federal Police and airport safety officers were on duty that night but were not near the hangar. The report found they wouldn’t have seen a helicopter that was operating at night with no lights.

“It was apparent that the pilot was wanting to conceal the departure from the airport from air traffic control and airport staff,” the report said.

There was no cockpit recorder or flight data recorder, but investigators pieced together the aircraft’s movements from its GPS tracker and ground radar data.

The report said the pilot was not authorized to fly the plane and while he had flown a Robinson R44 before, he hadn’t done so at night.

It found the helicopter wasn’t upright when it hit the hotel, but there was also no sign of mechanical failure.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Wimbledon is to replace all of its line judges with Live Electronic Line Calling from 2025, the tournament’s organisers have said.

In a major break from tradition, the championships will follow the lead of the other Grand Slam tournaments, the Australian Open and US Open, as well as a number of other tour events.

Hawk-Eye technology has been used on certain courts at Wimbledon since 2007, helping officials and allowing players to challenge line calls.

From 2025, the system will be fully automated across the entire site, including during qualifying at Roehampton.

It means line judges will no longer be required for the first time in the tournament’s 147-year history.

The All England Club’s chief executive Sally Bolton said organisers went through “a significant period of consideration and consultation” before deciding to make the switch.

Testing was carried out at last year’s event, Ms Bolton said, and after seeing the results, the club has decided the technology is “sufficiently robust” to move to a fully automated system.

She said it means players will be competing under the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour.

The club takes its responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon “very seriously,” she added.

“Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at The Championships for many decades and we recognise their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.”

The French Open, which has relied solely on human officials, is now the outlier, although it may well follow suit, with all ATP Tour events to feature the technology from next year.

One major concern for Wimbledon had been the loss of a prestigious opportunity for officials and the effect this could have at the lower levels of the sport.

In another change to the schedule, next year’s singles finals will move from 2pm on the final Saturday and Sunday to 4pm, with the men’s and women’s doubles finals to be held first at 1pm.

This post appeared first on sky.com

Briton Sir Demis Hassabis has been awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry, jointly with two other scientists.

The trio of Sir Demis, as well as Americans Professor David Baker and Dr John Jumper, were honoured on Wednesday for their work on decoding the structure of proteins and creating new ones.

The research has helped advances across a range of areas including drug development.

Half of the prize was awarded to Prof Baker “for computational protein design”, while the other half was shared by Sir Demis and Dr Jumper “for protein structure prediction”, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

Sir Demis, 48, is the chief executive of Google DeepMind, the artificial intelligence (AI) research subsidiary of Google. He studied Computer Science as an undergraduate at Queens’ College, Cambridge, and went on to complete a PhD in cognitive neuroscience at University College London. He also created the videogame company Elixir Studios before co-founding DeepMind.

Prof Baker, 62, is a professor at the University of Washington, in Seattle, while Dr Jumper, 39, also works as a senior research scientist.

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper utilised AI to predict the structure of almost all known proteins, while Prof Baker learnt how to master life’s building blocks and create entirely new proteins, the award body said.

Sir Demis said: “It’s totally surreal to be honest, quite overwhelming.”

After thanking his colleagues, including Dr Jumper, he added: “David Baker, we’ve got to know in the last few years, and he’s done some absolutely seminal work in protein design.

“So it’s really, really exciting to receive the prize with both of them.”

It is the second Nobel Prize awarded this week related to artificial intelligence after John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton were honoured in the physics category.

Speaking about AI, Sir Demis said: “That’s always been my passion, but… it’s like any powerful general-purpose technology, it can be used for harm as well if put in the wrong hands and used for the wrong ends.”

The prize, widely regarded as among the most prestigious in the scientific world, is worth 11 million Swedish krona (£810,000).

This post appeared first on sky.com

“I don’t think the committee had our phone numbers,” said Sir Demis Hassabis.

He found out he’d won the Nobel Prize for chemistry – but the Swedish awards committee had a hard job letting him know.

They ended up phoning Sir Demis’s wife on Microsoft Teams, who was working and repeatedly ignored them.

“Eventually about the third or fourth call, she decided to answer it,” he said.

Google DeepMind boss Sir Demis and his colleague Dr John Jumper, as well as the US’ Dr David Baker, have just won the Nobel Prize for chemistry for their work in artificial intelligence and biology.

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper, both based in London, won for their groundbreaking work in predicting protein structures.

The AI model they developed, AlphaFold, can accurately predict the structure of millions of proteins, which are found in every living thing around us.

Their work could have a “truly huge” impact in developing medicines, vaccines and improving human health, according to the Nobel committee.

“An experiment that takes about a year for a PhD student to do, AlphaFold will predict the answer in a few minutes,” said Dr Jumper, talking to Sky News after a whirlwind day.

He’d expected to spend Wednesday just “writing a bit of code”, instead he was in back-to-back interviews with the world’s media and just like Sir Demis, Dr Jumper was taken aback when he found out he’d just won the Nobel Prize.

“I knew that the call [to say you’d won] went about an hour before the press conference,” he said. “It had got to 30 minutes before the press conference and I said, ‘Okay, not this year’.”

Dr Jumper is 39 years old, making him the youngest chemistry laureate in 70 years.

“After I told my wife, ‘Well, not this year’, I got a phone call from Sweden and it was… exceptional and unbelievable.

“The look on my wife’s face was my favourite part… Other than getting the Nobel Prize.”

Sir Demis and Dr Jumper announced AlphaFold2 in 2020 and have now been able to predict the structure of virtually all the 200 million proteins that researchers have identified, according to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences who award the prizes.

Because of their work, scientists now better understand things like antibiotic resistance and have even created images of enzymes that can decompose plastic.

The potential for their AI tool to change the world is not lost on Dr Jumper.

“As excited as I’ve been to receive the Nobel [Prize], I’ll be just as excited when the first Nobel is given for discoveries that used AlphaFold – when it’s the basis of other people’s Nobel worthy work,” he said.

However, there are some people concerned about the risks of technology like AlphaFold, the worry is that this kind of technology could be used to create things like bioweapons or to enhance viruses.

This year, a group of scientists, including Dr Baker, called for safeguards to be built into AI technology working with proteins.

“We just need to be cautiously optimistic about what we’re doing,” said Sir Demis.

“Being bold with applying it to the good use cases, but also trying to mitigate where we can the risks.”

The winning trio will now share a prize of 11 million Swedish kroner (around £810,000).

This post appeared first on sky.com

As we start the final month of the presidential campaign, the race appears to remain very close – much like every election of this century (except for Barack Obama’s first race in 2008). The latest Fox News national poll shows a two-point race in the national popular vote, with Vice President Kamala Harris slightly ahead of former President Trump 50-48 – and each of the seven key battleground states similarly showing the candidates within the margin of error from each other. 

If you want to drop into the weeds (and I guess that’s why they pay me), I think there remain five key numbers that will indicate which candidate has the momentum in the race – and tell you which campaign is closer to achieving its goal.  

I’d argue the key ‘weeds that count’ are: Trump’s ‘number,’ Trump’s support among Hispanic and African American voters, Harris’s support among Republicans who don’t describe themselves as ‘MAGA,’ and Harris-Walz support among voters in rural America. 

Trump’s number is the number I’ve looked at all year: His share of the popular vote. All year it has hovered around 48% – in all the most-respected public polls. Trump’s political persona is about as solidified as any American politician in my professional lifetime. There is little that he, his detractors, or his supporters can say or do that will shake voters’ impression of him – either positively or negatively. His vote share has basically remained what it is through almost a decade of his public life.  

So, all year I’ve focused on Trump’s share of the vote. It isn’t going to change dramatically, but small swings may indicate strength or emerging weaknesses. The arc of Harris’s campaign – she quickly consolidated support among the bulk of voters who’d told pollsters from 2023 until July that they were ‘undecided.’ They weren’t really undecided. They were voters who didn’t like Trump but were lukewarm about President Joe Biden. And now the bulk of them are in the Harris column.  

But what about the rest? Now when I look at the undecided number (and it’s remarkably small), I think there might be some hidden Trump vote there. For example, Trump is at ~47% in the better polls in Florida, and hovering around 50% in Texas in similarly respected polls. That’s below the 52% he got in Texas in both 2016 and 2020, and the 51% he got in Florida in 2020.  

He will almost certainly win both states, which suggests that some folks telling pollsters they’re ‘undecided’ will, in the end, choose Trump. On the other hand, it could be a sign of some weakness among Trump voters. 

The voter groups where Trump is showing surprising strength is his support among minorities, especially Hispanic and African American voters. Prior to dropping out of the race, Biden was doing remarkably poorly among those groups; Trump had gotten less than 10% of the African American vote in 2020, and 35% of Hispanic support.  

In the latest Fox News national poll (September), Trump is getting over 40% of the Hispanic vote and almost 30% of the Black vote. And it explains the closeness of the contests in the battleground states. Looking at those numbers is key. If Trump can continue to run strong among Hispanic voters, he’ll likely win Arizona and Nevada. If Harris can recapture some of the 2020 Biden strength among African Americans, she’ll be able to win Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia. 

Conversely, the Harris numbers to look at are her support among rural voters (the locus of Trump’s base) and at her support among Republicans who say they aren’t part of the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. 

One of the reasons Harris picked Minnesota Governor, and occasionally folks, Tim Walz, was to try to make inroads among rural voters. They didn’t want to win the rural vote – they just wanted to lose by less. It was the rural vote that likely earned Trump victories in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in 2016 and propelled him into the White House.  

Can he do it? So far, the jury is out. His suboptimal performance in the Vance-Walz debate likely did little to win over rural voters – but they’re still at it. He doesn’t appear to mind going into rural settings – where he is often greeted by Trump supporters booing him – so it is a number that is key to study. 

Finally, there remains the non-MAGA GOP voters. Somewhere between a quarter to a third of GOP voters describe themselves as ‘non-MAGA.’ This was the group who supported former Ambassador Nikki Haley in the primaries. At that time, according to the Fox News Voter Analysis of Iowa caucus goers and New Hampshire and South Carolina primary voters, almost half of them said they would not vote for Trump in November.  

There are only limited signs of Trump weakness among that group now that we’re in a general election campaign. Still, in the most recent Fox News Arizona state poll, roughly one-in-five non-MAGA GOP voters said they were supporting Harris. That translates to roughly 6% of GOP voters ‘defecting’ to Harris. That’s enough to keep the state close, but probably not enough to win. Still, it represents a clear danger signal for Trump.  

Of particular concern are other signs of non-MAGA defection. For example, the same poll tested the Senate race between Republican Kari Lake and Democrat Reuben Gallego. In that race (where Gallego has a clear lead), Fully 16% of Republicans said they’d vote for Gallego. 6% of GOP Arizona voters would vote for Harris and another 10% said that while they’d vote for Trump, they’d defect from the GOP in the Senate race.  

Either way, it shows the instability of GOP support – and a wavering among some parts of the GOP.  

If Trump is able to shore up that non-MAGA weakness, he’ll be well positioned in November – if Harris is able to pull some of them to her side, she’ll be well-positioned. So, looking at her numbers among non-MAGA GOP voters is key. 

Suprisingly enough, in that Vance-Walz debate, Vance did a good job of trying to appeal to that non-MAGA group. I say surprisingly, since when Trump picked Vance, some analysts complained that Trump had doubled down on the MAGA wing of the party – and left the non-MAGA (the Haley voter) by the wayside.  

But Vance’s smooth explication of his (and Trump’s) positions on school violence, the war in the Middle East, and immigration – probably went a long way to trying to ameliorate Trump’s non-MAGA weakness. 

Yes, it’s in the weeds, and, yes, the subgroups are small relative to the overall nation. In looking at these numbers, note that they are subject to a significant margin of error. They may show evidence of a shift or just statistical noise. But they are the key numbers to watch in the coming weeks: Trump’s overall number, Trump’s support among minorities, the Harris vote in rural America, and the Harris vote among non-MAGA GOP voters.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

For a year now, freeing the hostages taken by Hamas has been a top goal for Israel, but 101 still remain unaccounted for. Hope of a deal to get them homein the foreseeable future is waning quickly. 

Of the 240 people taken hostage from Israel by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, 117 have either been freed during temporary truces or rescued during Israel Defense Forces (IDF) missions. Dozens of the 101 who have not been freed are believed to be dead. 

Four Americans – Keith Siegel, 65, Sagui Dekel-Chen, 36, Omer Neutra, 22, and Edan Alexander, 21 – remain trapped among them.  

Many hostage families have lost faith in the U.S. and Israeli governments. ‘We don’t believe that Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s priority is to bring home the hostages,’ Hannaha Siegel, Keith Siegel’s niece, told CNN on Monday. 

‘The ability to negotiate with [Hamas Leader Yaya] Sinwar to try to get the hostages that remain alive out is extremely unlikely,’ said Mark Schwartz, a retired Army general and former U.S. security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

‘There’s no strategic benefit at all for Hamas. The hostages are useful human shields and getting several hundred Palestinians out of prisons, big deal,’ he said, referring to a potential prisoner exchange. ‘That’s not going to extend the life of Hamas leadership that resides inside Gaza.’ 

President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have for months implored Netanyahu to agree to a cease-fire deal that would see the hostages returned home. 

However, as war spread from Gaza to Lebanon to Tel Aviv – and with Israel considering an aggressive response to Iran’s most recent missile attack – U.S. calls for a cease-fire increasingly rattle around an empty echo chamber. 

‘The mood is poor right now,’ said Michael Makovsky, president of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America.

‘What’s in Sinwar’s interest to make a deal? Hamas’ military capability is pretty much destroyed. I don’t think he thinks he’s ever going to get out alive. I don’t think he necessarily wants to leave Gaza alive anyway.’

Sinwar, Hamas’ shadowy leader and the architect of the Oct. 7 attacks, is believed to be alive and still committed to the destruction of Israel. 

On the eve of the anniversary of the attacks, Netanyahu held his first meeting on the plight of the hostages in a month. According to The Times of Israel, his officials warned him intel on the hostages was quickly drying up. They reportedly told him they believed half of the hostages remained alive and were subject to increasingly squalid conditions. They also warned that Hamas militants were under orders to execute them if they felt the IDF was closing in on their position. 

Hamas executed six hostages in a tunnel in Rafah in August as the IDF drew near. 

‘You want to hold out hope for someone to be rescued, but for a hostage deal, it’s not looking good,’ said Makovsky. 

‘I think Netanyahu should have demonstrated more sympathy towards the hostages early on, and then it became kind of entrenched that half the Israeli electorate didn’t like him anyway, so he didn’t care.

‘In fairness to him, he was the prime minister that cut what turned out to be a terrible deal – which they released over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners – for one Israeli hostage in Gaza,’ added Makovsky. ‘One of those prisoners was Sinwar.’

In 2011, Israel agreed to an exchange where it released 1,027 Palestinian prisoners – including Sinwar – for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Sinwar was 22 years into four life sentences he received in Israel for orchestrating the killing of two Israeli soldiers and four Palestinians he believed to be collaborators in 1989. 

Gershon Baskin, who led negotiations on that deal, said he believes Hamas is ready to strike an agreement – and it is not the one U.S. officials have worked on for months. 

‘It would end the war in three weeks with an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. They would release and return all the hostages, military, civilian, alive and dead, and there would be an agreed-upon release of Palestinian prisoners. Hamas has agreed to me in writing that they would transfer the governance in Gaza to a civilian, technocratic, professional government, which they will not be part of.’ 

Critics of such ideas say they fall short of eliminating Hamas, which could rebuild itself and once again threaten Israel.

Baskin does not work on behalf of Israel or Hamas in any official capacity, but he said U.S. officials are aware of the offer and need to pressure Netanyahu and Hamas to work it out between themselves. 

In May, Biden unveiled a three-phase deal that would see Hamas return 18–32 hostages in exchange for 800 Palestinian prisoners and a six-week pause in fighting. 

‘It’s a bad deal, and I know that the American leadership – [CIA Director Bill] Burns and [White House Middle East coordinator Brett] McGurk and others have invested themselves deeply in these negotiations, but they need to simply recognize that it’s not going anywhere,’ Baskin said. ‘It’s a dead deal, and they need to pick up another deal that might actually work.’ 

Efforts to reach the White House and the Israeli government for comment for purposes of this story were unsuccessful at press time. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

New polling shows former President Trump has a 9-point lead over Vice President Kamala Harris when it comes to handling the economy, the single most important issue for voters going into the 2024 presidential election.

The new poll from Gallup found that 54% of Americans say Trump is more capable of handling the economy, compared to 45% for Harris. The economy ranked as the most important issue for Republicans and for all Americans, but it didn’t rate in the top five for Democrats.

Veteran Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf says Democrats are simply confident in Harris’ plan to handle the economy.

‘Independents are looking for a reason to vote for a candidate, but they just haven’t found it yet,’ Sheinkopf told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘Americans focus on the issue most important to them in every election. This time it’s their pockets. And they are still feeling pain no matter what candidates say. Time is running out for Harris to prove she can make it better.’

He went on to argue that the economy is no less politicized an issue as immigration or abortion, suggesting polarization has an outsized impact on voter’s opinions on the economy. 

For Republicans, the top issues after the economy are immigration, terrorism and national security, crime and taxes.

For Democrats, the top issue is democracy in the U.S., followed by the type of Supreme Court justices a candidate would pick, abortion, health care and education.

Trump also holds leads over Harris on immigration (54%-45%) and foreign affairs (52%-47%). Harris holds her own leads on the top issues for Democrats, however, including health care (54%-44%), abortion (56%-40%) and climate change (61%-35%).

Climate change ranks as the least important issue for Republicans, with just 5% saying it is a priority. The least important issues for Democrats are the federal budget deficit and trade with other nations, both tied at 16%.

Gallup conducted the poll from Sept. 16-28, surveying 941 registered voters via telephone interviews on cellphones and landlines. The poll advertises a margin of error of 4%.

A New York Times/Siena College survey released on Tuesday found that Harris has a slight lead over Trump in a national poll. The survey found that Harris stands at 49% support among likely voters nationwide, with the former president and GOP nominee at 46%.

According to the poll, Harris stands at 47% and Trump at 44% in a multi-candidate field. Green Party candidate Jill Stein and Libertarian Chase Oliver each grabbed 1%, with roughly 7% supporting another candidate or undecided.

Harris’ edge – which is within the survey’s sampling error – is up from the New York Times/Siena poll from last month, when the two major party nominees were deadlocked at 47%.

Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser and Ashley Papa contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS