Author

admin

Browsing

At least 15 people have been killed and 14 injured in clashes between inmates at one of Ecuador’s largest and most notorious prisons, local authorities say.

The violence broke out early Tuesday in one of the pavilions at Litoral Penitentiary in the coastal city of Guayaquil, according to national prison agency SNAI.

Both Guayaquil, Ecuador’s largest city, and the prison itself are notorious for violent confrontations between rival gangs.

By Tuesday afternoon, authorities said they had managed to regain control of the prison and carried out a large-scale search.

Murder charges will be filed against at least nine inmates, the Attorney General’s Office said.

Ecuador’s prison system has long been the main theater of violence in the country, with hundreds of inmates killed in recent years as members of competing criminal organizations square off.

Security forces have often struggled to confront the gangs inside the overcrowded facilities, where inmates have been known to take control of branches of the penitentiaries and run criminal networks from behind bars, according to Ecuadorian authorities.

This is just the latest violent episode at Litoral Penitentiary, which has seen riots and massacres in recent years and is widely considered the country’s most dangerous prison.

Last year, more than 30 people were killed, some of them beheaded, during a multi-day uprising at the prison, while in September 2021, clashes between rival gangs left more than 100 people dead.

Two months ago, the penitentiary’s director María Daniela Icaza was killed in an armed attack while she was driving home.

Litoral Penitentiary is among five facilities that make up a major prison complex in Guayaquil.

In January, notorious gang leader José Adolfo “Fito” Macías escaped from one of those facilities, in a jailbreak that kicked off a wave of violence across the country.

Following the escape, President Daniel Noboa declared a state of emergency, deploying the armed forces across the country to crack down on gangs and criminal groups.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

The Princess of Wales will host her annual Christmas carol concert on December 6, with a focus on “how much we need each other, especially in the most difficult times of our lives,” Kensington Palace has announced.

It will be the princess’ fourth “Together at Christmas” carol service at Westminster Abbey and it will broadcast in the United Kingdom on Christmas Eve.

Catherine began the festive tradition in 2021, surprising British television viewers with a piano performance of “For Those Who Can’t Be Here” with Scottish singer-songwriter Tom Walker, recognizing the impact of the pandemic.

Linked to the prince and princess’s Royal Foundation charity, this year’s concert will “shine a light on individuals from all over the UK who have shown love, kindness and empathy towards others in their communities,” a statement from Kensington Palace said.

Some 1,600 people, nominated for their commitment to helping people in need, will be joined at Westminster Abbey by members of the royal family and other well-known faces.

Carols will be sung by the Westminster Abbey choir alongside performances from musicians including Paloma Faith, Olivia Dean, Gregory Porter and young performers from Restore the Music.

Fifteen “Together at Christmas” community carol services will also take place across the UK.

GET OUR FREE ROYAL NEWSLETTER

    Last year’s concert saw the prince and princess accompanied by their three children and other members of the royal family.

    The news comes after Kate’s back-to back appearances at Remembrance Day events in London at the weekend.

    In September, the princess announced she was cancer-free and would be taking a phased approach to resuming public royal duties. Last month, she accompanied William on visit to Southport in northwest England, where the couple met with the bereaved families of three children killed in a knife attack in July.

    This post appeared first on cnn.com

    South Korean actor Song Jae-lim, a former model who rose to prominence in K-dramas, was found dead in Seoul on Tuesday. He was 39.

    Born in 1985, Song began his entertainment career with the 2009 film “Actresses.”

    He gained widespread recognition for his portrayal of a royal guard in the 2012 historical drama “Moon Embracing the Sun,” and reached further fame through an appearance on the reality show “We Got Married.” His final performance was in the musical “La Rose De Versailles,” which ended in October.

    The final posts on Song’s Instagram account, two selfies shared in January, have accumulated more than 61,000 likes. Comments are disabled on the account.

    South Korean stars paid tribute to Song following the news of his death.

    How to get help

    Help is available if you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or mental health matters.
    In the US: Call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
    Globally: The International Association for Suicide Prevention and Befrienders Worldwide have contact information for crisis centers around the world.

      “This is mad… Jae-lim… you were such a cheerful guy… I can’t believe this. I’m so sorry for not contacting you or caring for you enough,” actor Park Ho-san said alongside a photo taken with Song posted on Instagram.

      In another Instagram post, actor Hong Seok-cheon said: “I’m sad that I can’t see your wonderful smile again… I’m so sorry, rest in peace.”

      The recent deaths of K-pop idols and K-drama stars have highlighted ongoing concerns about mental health and industry pressures in South Korea’s entertainment industry.

      ASTRO boy band member Moon bin died last year at age 25. K-pop singer and actress Sulli was also 25 when she died in 2019. And two years earlier, boyband SHINee’s Kim Jong-hyun was found dead at his home at age 27.

      Entertainment agencies have implemented various mental health support systems, including counseling services and more flexible schedules, but observers say the highly competitive nature of K-entertainment, combined with intense public scrutiny, and expectations of perfection in appearance and behavior, are affecting stars.

      This post appeared first on cnn.com

      The UK has unveiled a punchy new climate goal to slash its emissions by 81% by 2035.

      The government said it is on a mission to “tackle the climate crisis in a way that makes the British people better off”, by investing in clean, home-grown power and cutting ties with volatile fossil fuel markets.

      Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: “The only way to protect current generations is by making Britain a clean energy superpower, and the only way to protect future generations is by tackling the climate crisis.”

      The new target to cut emissions by 81% compared with 1990 levels would “protect our environment, deliver energy security and restore our global climate reputation”, he said.

      The pledge has gone down well at the COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, where rich, polluting countries like the UK are expected to lead by example among the 200 countries gathered for the talks.

      Kenya’s foreign secretary called the target “quite ambitious”.

      The world needs “concrete examples of one of the key economies making positive strides towards dealing with climate change”, Musalia Mudavadi told Sky News.

      But he warned countries would be watching to ensure “that nobody is back-pedalling”.

      The UK’s pledge matches what its climate advisers say is needed to tackle climate change at home and meet a promise it made under the landmark Paris Agreement, struck at COP21 in 2015.

      But the advisers, the Climate Change Committee (CCC), warned the government is missing plans it needs to get to that target.

      “The good news is [the 81% target] is achievable,” said the CCC’s new chief Emma Pinchbeck.

      “The less good news for government is they are behind on their [existing] targets.”

      That’s not because “we don’t have the technologies available, or that the economics don’t work”, she said.

      “The issue is that we haven’t had a delivery plan from the government that can get us there.”

      The UK has been “arguably the leading country in the world at getting emissions out of the power plant that provides the electricity coming through your plug”.

      But the “problem right now is definitely in how we heat our homes and transport, how we get around”, and flying and shipping also need plans to get clean, she said.

      This post appeared first on sky.com

      A legal challenge over the decision to give consent to the UK’s largest untapped oil field has begun in Edinburgh.

      Greenpeace and Uplift have jointly raised a judicial review at the Court of Session, arguing consent for the Rosebank oil field northwest of Shetland ought to be paused and reassessed.

      The two environmental groups are also arguing against the exploration of the Jackdaw oil field off Aberdeen in the same legal case.

      The former Conservative-led UK government approved Shell’s proposals to develop the Jackdaw field in 2022 and cleared Equinor and Ithaca Energy’s plans to drill in the Rosebank field last September.

      The campaign groups are arguing that the government, along with the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA), failed to consider the full impact of emissions caused by burning oil and gas from the fields.

      They are also arguing their reasons for approving the schemes were not transparent and that the development will disrupt a marine protected area.

      Activists calling for the projects to be halted held a protest outside the court on Tuesday morning.

      Ruth Crawford KC, representing Greenpeace UK, told the court a “substantive error of law” had been made when consent was granted for the two schemes based on limited information on their environmental impact and that the charity was seeking “remedy”.

      “It was not simply a matter of discretion on whether or not to take emissions into account, it is a matter of the law the impact of emissions had to be taken into account,” she said.

      Ms Crawford argued for both developments to be paused and for the oil companies involved in the projects to be made to submit revised environmental impact assessments.

      She said these assessments should include consideration of so-called Scope 3 emissions which would be produced by burning all the oil and gas to be extracted from the fields.

      Shell said Jackdaw is a “vital project for UK energy security” and will provide enough fuel to heat 1.4 million UK homes.

      Equinor has similarly said Rosebank is “vital for the UK” in terms of local investment, jobs and energy security.

      The case, before Lord Ericht, continues.

      This post appeared first on sky.com

      Keir Starmer’s arrival at COP29, with a promise to drastically cut the UK’s carbon emissions by 81%, will be a small ray of sunshine in an otherwise gloomy start to the climate talks.

      The election of Donald Trump, who has vowed to drag the world’s largest economy out of the negotiations, was a colossal setback for a round of talks dedicated to raising ambition – and cash – for the transition away from fossil fuels.

      If that wasn’t bad enough, Starmer was one of the few heads of the G20 to actually show up at the talks.

      President Biden is absent – so too are the leaders of China, Brazil, Germany and France.

      Starmer wants to portray the commitment to cutting emissions as a sign of his confidence the UK can be a leading economy without fossil fuels.

      The prime minister’s pledge reinforces the message these talks are urgently trying to send – that net zero is an opportunity for growth, not economic suicide.

      But back home it’s a political risk.

      Getting to the 81% cut in emissions within 10 years will take a colossal and, in the short term, costly effort. One he was forced to insist would not involve his government telling people how to live their lives.

      However, it will certainly involve changes to how people live.

      Labour’s plans for zero-carbon electricity, already ambitious, won’t get us there alone.

      Making homes more energy efficient and heating them without gas will be essential.

      So too will fiddly things like protecting peat bogs, our uplands and reforming agriculture.

      While it might be portrayed as political excess, in truth, the government had no choice.

      The 81% target is the one the Committee on Climate Change advised the government is the only way it can meet its obligations under the UK Climate Change Act introduced by the Conservatives with cross-party support.

      That piece of legislation is, in turn, the one designed to ensure the UK meets the terms of the Paris Agreement that the UN climate process is committed to.

      So, while they’ll celebrate the prime minister’s announcement at this summit for the signal it sends to other less ambitious countries – it’s not seen as radical, but necessary.

      And praise for the prime minister will be limited here in Baku.

      COP29 is mainly about money – and agreeing on a new financial mechanism to allow poorer countries that have yet to burn their “share” of fossil fuels to not follow the path that made countries like ours rich.

      Starmer has arrived at this summit with a bold domestic commitment, but no promise of additional money for that process.

      The UK is not alone – many other rich countries aren’t willing to ask their taxpayers to fork out more cash to tackle climate change.

      The rest of these talks will be taken up with how that reality tallies with the spiralling cost of climate impacts in both rich and poor countries alike.

      This post appeared first on sky.com

      Justice Samuel Alito has no plans to retire from the Supreme Court anytime soon, a source close to the justice told the Wall Street Journal, halting a flurry of speculation among some Republican leaders that Alito, 74, could vacate the bench to make room for a younger, more conservative jurist.

      Rumors about Alito’s retirement began swirling almost immediately after Trump’s victory in the 2024 election, which also saw Republicans set to take back control of the Senate and retain control of the House in January.

      With no filibuster allowed on Supreme Court appointments, the GOP majority would allow Trump to face little if any resistance in confirming his picks for high court justices, should the court’s two oldest conservative justices, Alito and Clarence Thomas, retire.

      Alito, for his part, has made clear he has no plans to do so. 

      ‘Despite what some people may think, this is a man who has never thought about this job from a political perspective,’ a person close to Alito told the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news of his intention to remain on the bench. 

      ‘The idea that he’s going to retire for political considerations is not consistent with who he is,’ this person added.

      Alito was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2006 by President George W. Bush. 

      At 74, Alito is the second-oldest justice on the bench behind Justice Clarence Thomas, 76, who was appointed to the court by President George H.W. Bush in 1991. Sonia Sotomayor, appointed by President Obama in 2009, is 70.

      But pressure for Alito and Thomas to step aside to make way for younger, Trump-picked candidates could prove to be deeply polarizing at a time when public approval of the Supreme Court is in the mid 40s, according to a Gallup survey in September.

      Conservatives currently hold a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court. Trump named three justices to the Supreme Court during his first term, preserving its conservative majority. President Biden, for his part, most recently named Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the court in 2022 after the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer.

      If Alito and Thomas were to retire from the bench, Trump could become the first president since Eisenhower, also a Republican, to name a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court.

      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      Despite his own isolationist musings, the first picks of President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration hail from a decidedly more traditionalist wing of the Republican Party.

      On Tuesday, Trump formally announced that Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla., would be his national security adviser. Sources have said Trump is set on tapping Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., for secretary of state.

      Together with New York Rep. Elise Stefanik — set for the role of ambassador to the United Nations — the trio is expected to further a staunchly pro-Israel agenda.

      Ukrainian advocates are also somewhat relieved. 

      ‘Kyiv looks at these appointments with some quiet relief — they clearly know there’s room for engagement,’ one source familiar with Ukrainian operations told Fox News Digital. They added that after a Biden administration that they believe has been overly fearful of escalating U.S. involvement in the war with Russia, ‘a not insignificant number of senior Ukrainian officials are cautiously optimistic about what a change of pace might look like. 

      Waltz, who once served as a counterterrorism adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney, is widely regarded as a hawk on China and Iran. He was vociferously opposed to President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

      ‘What no one can ever do for me, including this administration right now, is articulate a counterterrorism plan that’s realistic without us there,’ Waltz said in an interview days after the withdrawal. 

      The former Army Green Beret officer and ex-CEO of a defense contracting company introduced legislation during the first Trump administration that would have prevented a mass troop drawdown in Afghanistan unless the director of national intelligence certified that the Taliban would not associate with al-Qaeda. 

      ‘I think we’re in for a long haul and I think our nation’s leadership needs to begin telling the American people, ‘I’m sorry. We don’t have a choice. We’re 15 years into what is going to be a multi-generational war because we’re talking about defeating an idea,” Waltz said about Afghanistan at the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2017.

      Waltz voted for keeping the Iraq War Authorization on the books in 2021 and voted against ending U.S. support for the Saudi war in Yemen. 

      In an interview with NPR last week, Waltz said the war between Russia and Ukraine can end if the U.S. applies some leverage. 

      Russia’s ‘war machine will dry up very quickly’ with U.S. economic sanctions, Waltz said, as well as ‘taking the handcuffs off of the long-range weapons we provided Ukraine.’ Biden has long refused to allow Ukraine to use U.S. weapons to strike deep inside Russia. 

      Last month, when Israel conducted a counterstrike on Iran’s military targets, Waltz bemoaned that it hadn’t gone after Iran’s oil and nuclear facilities. ‘Did Biden/Harris pressure Israel once again to do less than it should?’ he questioned. 

      Rubio, meanwhile, is a noted hawk on China, Iran and Venezuela, where he has been working to unseat dictator Nicolas Maduro. 

      Rubio, at one time, supported U.S. aid to Ukraine, but when the matter came up again earlier this year, he was one of 15 Republicans to vote against a supplemental funding package, citing insufficient border provisions. 

      He’s been a strong proponent of U.S. support for Taiwan. When Trump raised concerns about the U.S.’s support for Taiwan and suggested the island should pay the U.S. for its defense, Rubio predicted Trump would ‘continue to support Taiwan’ if he reclaimed the White House.

      Like Trump, both Waltz and Rubio have been critical of NATO allies for not spending enough on defense. Rubio has insisted Europe should ‘take the lead’ on its defense: ‘Germany, France, and the United Kingdom are more than capable of managing their relationship with the nuclear-armed belligerent to their east. But they’ll never take ownership so long as they can rely on America.’

      Rubio cosponsored legislation last year that would bar any president from pulling the U.S. from NATO without congressional approval, a measure that was seen as a precaution if Trump were to win the presidency and follow through with his frequent threats to abandon the alliance.

      His pick triggered some backlash from some Trump die-hards who view him as too hawkish. 

      ‘Apparently there hasn’t been a SOS pick yet FYSA [for your situational awareness],’ posted Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) late Monday on X, after news outlets began reporting Trump had settled on Rubio. 

      Libertarian-minded comedian Dave Smith said Tuesday that Rubio is ‘a disaster.’

      ‘Might as well give Liz Cheney the State Department,’ Smith wrote. ‘Awful sign.’

      Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that Waltz and Rubio signal ‘above all, a hard line toward China not only on economics but across the board — on political, military, and ideological competition.’ 

      ‘The picks leave me wondering whether Trump will deliver on his sometimes restrained foreign policy promises, including his stated desire to end the war in Ukraine sooner rather than later and to see Israel wrap up its wars,’ he said. ‘I’m getting flashbacks to the first Trump administration.’

      But, he added, ‘Rubio is no longer quite the Rubio many remember from 2016.’ 

      ‘Rubio seems to understand that the United States faces resource constraints and needs to set strategic priorities in an increasingly competitive world.’

      And some restraint-minded thinkers hold out cautious optimism. 

      ‘If [Rubio] channels Trump’s approach rather than pursuing his own agenda, he could redefine the state department’s role in a way that is both respected and effective abroad. Rubio knows that his future prospects are tied to his ability to execute Trump’s policy, not personal ambitions,’ said Jason Beardsley, senior coalitions adviser for Concerned Veterans for America. 

      ‘Having worked closely with Waltz, I can vouch for his deep understanding of America’s strategic priorities. He’s passionate about reforming the DoD from within and ensuring national security without overextending our military in costly, unnecessary engagements.’

      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      President-elect Trump announced that billionaire Elon Musk and former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy will lead the Department of Government Efficiency.

      Trump said that the pair will work together to ‘dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies.’

      ‘It will become, potentially, ‘The Manhattan Project’ of our time,’ the announcement on Tuesday evening said. ‘Republican politicians have dreamed about the objectives of ‘DOGE’ for a very long time.’

      The president-elect said that Musk and Ramaswamy will provide ‘advice and guidance from outside of Government, and will partner with the White House and Office of Management & Budget to drive large scale structural reform, and create an entrepreneurial approach to Government never seen before.’

      Trump said that the agency will be focused on creating a more efficient U.S. government that looks to make ‘life better for all Americans.’

      ‘Importantly, we will drive out the massive waste and fraud which exists throughout our annual $6.5 Trillion Dollars of Government Spending. They will work together to liberate our Economy, and make the U.S. Government accountable to ‘WE THE PEOPLE.” Trump said. 

      ‘Their work will conclude no later than July 4, 2026 – A smaller Government, with more efficiency and less bureaucracy, will be the perfect gift to America on the 250th Anniversary of The Declaration of Independence. I am confident they will succeed!’

      In a X post, Ramaswamy reacted to his appointment.

      ‘We will not go gently, Elon Musk,’ he wrote in the post.

      Ramaswamy has been a vocal supporter of Trump after he suspended his presidential campaign in Jan. 24.

      Similarly, Musk has been a key component to Trump’s campaign – with the tech entrepreneur crisscrossing key battleground states leading up to the 2024 election.

      In response to his position in Trump’s White House, Musk wrote: ‘Threat to democracy? Nope, threat to BUREAUCRACY!!!’

      The world’s richest man, who said he voted for former Democratic presidential candidates including President Biden in the past, endorsed Trump this summer following the first assassination attempt on the 45th president on July 13. 

      The slew of Trump Cabinet positions came quickly after the president-elect’s landslide victory against Vice President Kamala Harris.

      Trump has selected top Republicans, with the president-elect expected to select Florida Sen. Marco Rubio to serve as his Secretary of State and South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem as secretary of Homeland Security. 

      In addition, Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., has been tapped for United Nations ambassador and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee as ambassador to Israel.

      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      President-elect Trump announced on Tuesday that he will appoint South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem to serve as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

      ‘Kristi has been very strong on Border Security,’ a statement released by the Trump transition team read. ‘She was the first Governor to send National Guard Soldiers to help Texas fight the Biden Border Crisis, and they were sent a total of eight times.’

      ‘She will work closely with ‘Border Czar’ Tom Homan to secure the Border, and will guarantee that our American Homeland is secure from our adversaries,’ the statement added.

      This is a breaking news story. Check back with us for updates.

      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS